this shit is why they failed to conquer the world. too busy making egg-related devices to beat Russia.
worst subreddit of ever award goes to r/polcompballanarchy I think
in which we have wonderful microcelebrities such as:
u/syndicalistic, a (possibly transfem) left-wing fascist.
u/thascynd, a “reactionary monarcho-tribalist anacap” who wants to return to pre-Colombian society but extremely racist this time
u/vanguard_hippie, an eco-anarchist who also believes in creating a hedonistic ecologist aristocracy
and more!
my Roman Empire is the Roman Empire if Marc Antony had got what he wanted and established a Romano-Macedonian-Egyptian imperial dynasty descended from himself, Caesar, and Cleopatra to rule over a joint Roman-Egyptian Empire with Persian aesthetics.
gotta love the genre of activism where indigenous people can only be respected if we make them out as some kind of übermensch
Link for full article below.
> see YouTube video from ‘7 years ago’
> “wow a video from 2013 that’s crazy”
> a horrible realization
“We should celebrate objectively worse architecture because every person who likes good architecture is a Nazi”
insane take.
there has always been one state that is more powerful than the others. there always will be. we are currently living through a period where that state is mostly good and we should be happy about it.
as trans activists we have GOT to get more comfortable with embracing the idea that we are a threat to the usamerican status quo. no more of this "we're the real america lovers, we make america great" shit. usamerica isn't and should not be made great, because it is a racist imperialist patriarchal state that has caused huge amounts of death and devastation worldwide. all our struggles are interconnected.
we should not be licking the ideological boots of a political system that gives zero shits about any of us, we should be dismantling it and replacing it with something that does. if trans existence is a threat to this country, then GOOD. I'm fucking proud of that. and you should be too.
did I prove OP’s point? I don’t think so
I offered that anecdote to draw a parallel between two people who I thought were similar.
Horner disliked tyrannosaurs because he preferred hadrosaurs, and thus tried to prove that tyrannosaurs were Objectively Bad.
Op dislikes lottienat because they prefer mistynat, and thus in this post attempted to prove that lottienat is Objectively Bad. *Are you picking up what I’m putting down?*
My point was that it’s fine to dislike something but going this far is just… kind of pointless. Let people enjoy things. I don’t go around posting about how mistynat is evil and bad and no one should ship it ever, even though I prefer lottienat.
can we talk about how lottienats disregard travnat/ mistynat/travis/misty as characters for their ship? they're insanely important to nat. and disregarding them means disregarding nat's development, drives, and ideals. they literally changed nat's perspective and character. like do you even care about lottienat as characters? and the whole 'i hate men so i'll ignore him and misty's a freak so i'll ignore her' like way to strip natalie of possibly the narratively two most important people to her
and i fear lottienats have a super surface level understanding be another thing is like. whether you like travnat/travis or not he's important for her characters development and drive for her entire life. there's a reason why travis haunts her story, whether you like him or not you gotta understand why he's fundamental for her character
kill yourself, cracker 🙄
Me: maybe perhaps people shouldn’t live under dictatorships
tumblr:
Montagnard, Liberal, Radical, transfem. Autocrats of all stripes are not welcome here, be you fascist, communist, or monarchist. Current obsessions:YellowjacketsYes MinisterTESThe French RevolutionPoetry
211 posts