an estimated 1-5% (so lets say 2.5) of the world population is ace, now lets half that for the 50-50 gender split, thats 1.25, and 80% of asexual women have experienced rape at some point in their life, thats 1%.
instead of ...not... hating on 1% of the population whove faced rape (and are women), she protects a bassicly non-existent group of likely hundreds-...- well just hundreds, at the cost of two whole groups of people (0.6%~, and 2.5%~).
shes being extremely hateful and bigoted towards 248,000,000~ people, whilst """protecting""" (people can go in the oppisite sex's bathroom anyway) a miniscule group of just a few hundred, even having a significant (about 1/3) of that group having experienced something she should be concretely against (rape towards women) according to her entire **CLAIMED** belief.
shes either delicately misinformed, or just bigoted, and in neither one she is a feminist, because she just isnt.
The fact that jkr doesnt seem to realise that the freedom to remove and decenter sex from your lifestyles and relationships, to not be told that sexual experience gives you measurable value, or to simply not be forced to be sexual when you dont want to be is such a massive part of women's liberation just cements what I already suspected: that shes never been a feminist at all, just a racist old creep with no life outside of her hatred