Ok Uh. How Do You Hypothetically Say "i Want To Study You" In A Friendly Way

also I don't get what "bad representation" is supposed to mean. given a number of symptoms and creating a character that has those symptom, it is almost certain that there exists an autistic person who will relate to that character, which is what the representation is for, no?

I've seen people making fun of the main character in the good doctor and saying that he's a bad representation, but the whole "I am a surgeon" situation is the most relatable thing I have ever seen in a show, so to me it's doing its job as a representation

how can someone simultaneously claim the existence of a "bad representation" and that every autistic person is different? it doesn't make sense to me

You can ask for more diverse autistic representation in media and criticize the current without making fun of the "stereotypical" traits autistic characters show because, you know, many of us do have these traits. And we're not faking it, and we are not stereotypes, and our traits and interest are not something to be ashamed of.

Hello, dear! 🌻

I saw your post wanting book recommendations. I'm sorry for your previous struggles, but I hope this list may help you find something you love!

-"The Housekeeper and the Professor" by Yōko Ogawa (The professor is a mathematician!)

-if you like Vonnegut, you may like Haruki Murakami, specifically his older titles like "Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" and "Norwegian Wood" (I feel these books do a good job of expanding on people's motivations and moods.)

-"The Elegance of the Hedgehog" by Muriel Barbery (Again, excellent at conveying emotions.)

-"Hunting and Gathering" by Anna Gavalda (This one is technically a romance - a genre which I personally would normally HATE - but it portrays such realistic characters, their struggles and their natural dialogue during fights that it actually felt more like I was reading about a collection of lives that I had the pleasure of spying on from above. I really love this book!)

-for WWI and WWII-themed titles, I'd recommend the Battlefield comics by Garth Ennis (He's SO good at writing believable characters and realistic dialogues.)

-if you don't mind high fantasy, any of the books in Terry Praychett's Discworld series about the wizards might be up your alley (You can read them independently without issue, or start from the beginning of any of the wizard titles. You can find a reading guide online! The wizards of his world are very regimented about how magic works - somewhat like mathematicians - and it's very funny.)

-the "Cemetery of Forgotten Books" series by Carlos Ruiz Zafón (I'd skip the 4th one - the main character/POV changed and I wasn't as impressed with the writing in that one - but the first 3 books are an absolute dream to read. The characters are so charming, lovable or completely horrifying, it feels like a wonderful foreign mystery series that takes place in 1940s Spain. It was really interesting to try to keep track of such a unique mystery amidst the second world war.)

I hope those help! Please enjoy your reading journey. ♡

hi, and thank you so much for the recommendations! I appreciate it a lot, those books sound really good

mathermatical notation explained

symbol        meaning

=                   equals

=/=                not equals

<                   left

>                   right

!                    LOUD NUMBER

~                   worm

π                  stonehenge

√                   right answer

x                   wrong answer

⋯                  soon…

∮                   what Exacrly the fuck

∝                   fish

∞                   fish with 2 heads

↯                    lightning

:⇔                 he Scream

10 IX 2022

today I need some extra motivation to study because I didn't sleep well these past few days and it has drastic effects on my productivity, energy, motivation and what have you

also I am struggling to make the choice as to what I should do today

yesterday I started solving some basic exercises from hatcher's textbook

Δ-complex structures are becoming more intuicitve with time. take my solutions with a grain of salt, I am just starting to learn about these things and won't vouch for them lmao

some more complicated objects (the last one is an example of a lense space)

I decided to study commutative algebra today

so far I'm enjoying it. not as much as algebraic topology (which will always be my number 1) but it has its beauty

right now I'm at hom and tensor functors, the structures are fairly complicated, but pretty, and they look like they need to be studied in stages, with repetition and breaks, to fully grasp what's going on

my sensory issues are terrible today and I'm exhausted and hyperactive at the same time uh

I'll try working through a lecture on commutative algebra and give an update on how it went later

update: I studied for a while, but it wasn't going great so I decided to take a nap instead. god knows I tried

foolproof plan

god I hate when people do that. bonus points for "so the exam was super easy. what did you get?"

Hi ppl who are nosy and want to know ur grades so they can judge how smart u are are annoying as fuck

Julie D’Aubigny was a 17th-century bisexual French opera singer and fencing master who killed or wounded at least ten men in life-or-death duels, performed nightly shows on the biggest and most highly-respected opera stage in the world, and once took the Holy Orders just so that she could sneak into a convent and shag a nun.

(via Feminism)

september

I decided to start posting monthly, I hope it will help me keep it regular during the semester, it may also bring more structure into my posts

I gave my talk at the conference, I was surprised with the engagement I received, people asked a lot of questions even after the lecture was over. it seemed to be very successful in a sense that so many people found the topic interesting

what I need to do the most in the next 3 weeks is learn the damn geometry. sometimes I take breaks to study algebraic tolology, I did that yesterday

you guys seem to enjoy homology so here is me computing the simplicial homology groups of the projective plane. I tried to take one of these aesthetic photos I sometimes see on other studyblrs but unfortunately this is the best I can do lmao

my idea for mainly reading and taking notes only when it's for something really complicated seems to be working. I focus especially on the problem-solving side of things, because as I learned the hard way, I need to learn the theory and problem-solving separately. what I found is that sitting down and genuinely trying to prove the theorems stated in the textbook is a good way to get a grasp of how the problems related to that topic are generally treated. sometimes making one's own proof is too difficult, well, no wonder, experienced mathematicians spend months trying to get the result, so why would I expect myself to do that in one sitting. then I try to put a lot of effort into reading the proof, so that later I can at least describe how it's done. I find this quite effective when it comes to learning a particular subject. I will never skip the proof again lmao

in a month I'll try to post about the main things I will have managed to do, what I learned, what I solved, and hopefully more art projects

17 IX 2022

for the past few days life was treating me quite aggressively. today I had a terrible migraine, I feel weak and tired in general. doing math in a state like that isn't as pleasant so obviously I didn't do much, prioritized my health instead

during the semester I used The introduction to manifolds by Loring Tu to study analysis and I forgot that there were many nice exercises there that I didn't have time for but promised myself I would try them eventually

so tonight was the night and I studied grassmannians

I had some "results" done on my own, which later confirmed to be true, namely that the grassmannian over ℝⁿ for a 1-dim subspace is equivalent to a projective space of dimension n-1. I'm pretty sure that we are getting the projective of the same dimension for n-1 dim subspaces but I didn't calculate anything for n>3 so I might go back to that one day

it's fun to get hunches like that even if they turn out to be completely obvious to the authors of textbooks lmao

I am finally in the place with studying the theory for homology, commutative algebra and apparently differential topology (as it turned out today), where I have a variety of exercises I can try and that's the good part for me, always helps to get deeper insights and allows me to be more active

a friend asked me for a talk about the zariski topology in the context of algebraic sets and spectra of rings, so I'll see her soon for that. she will give me a personalized lecture about her thesis, which is about general topology. I am not a big fun of general topo but I'm always a slut for lectures about math so am excited for that

I hope my body will get its shit together because I still have to prep my lecture on euclidean geometry and when I don't feel good it's super difficult to motivate myself to do things that are not super exciting. I will never see productivity as a value on its own for this very reason lol I can barely do anything I don't find interesting

I know one person who started phd without master's but that's in computer science and he already had a research startup running independently. he had a med degree already and his research is about using ML in medicine, so he was granted a "special permission" to start a phd. the guy is a very hard-working genius

now when it comes to math, one of my friends claimed that it is possible to start phd after bsc if someone graduates magna cum laude or something. I never heard of that before and it sounds insane, so I asked my advisor about it and he never heard of that either lol moreover he said that it's a stupid idea unless someone already has a few publications

afaik in the US the undergraduate degree takes 4 years and phd takes 5, it's like a mix of masters and the actual phd, so I guess it evens itself out

okay this might sound stupid to a lot of you but I thought you need a masters degree before you can do a PhD. so weird to me seeing 22 year olds doing a PhD after a bachelors degree. I don't know where I got this idea but I'm having a hard time rearranging my world view around this, even though this is so inconsequential thing to be wrong about xd