Question for my fellow theorists:
I know at lot of the time when there is a fourth-wall breaking moment in a show, theorists tend to ignore it when creating theories because 1, it doesn’t follow the logic of the universe of the series (like a show that is realistic without any “magic”), and 2, the moment is obviously for comedic purposes and doesn’t matter to the plot. So, I’m wondering if when we’re creating theories about how we think the sides work/C!Thomas’s universe works (and not just fun head-canons, theories about how things might actually work in the story Thomas and co has written), do we ignore these moments?:
-When Thomas reads “nods in agreement” from the script out loud on accident instead of preforming the action and Logan corrects him
-Patton attempting to give Thomas a hug but being unable to/being blocked and knocked backward because of the fourth-wall and it being impossible for that to happen since Thomas plays both C!Thomas and Patton
-(not sure about this one but I’ll include it anyway) Thomas just sitting on the couch with his eyes closed instead of actually being in a court room with the sides
Do we just ignore these when making theories? Or not? Thank you, theorists friends :D