not your, the usual 'India protecting itself = India is invading Pakistan' people's standard of neutrality.
I should have articulated that better, my bad.
so that's what happened
one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega
Sorry for some of the AI-speakensese below, I'm using ChatGPT to clean up my words here
By "standards of neutrality," I mean the way some people claim to be neutral when discussing India-Pakistan issues but seem to automatically frame India’s actions—like defending its borders or responding to attacks—as “invading” or aggressing against Pakistan. It’s like their baseline for “neutral” assumes India is always the instigator, ignoring context like cross-border militancy or provocations. I’m calling out that double standard where “neutrality” feels skewed against India.
I meant to share the NY Times article as a source with this standard of neutrality for people who read the posts that show India's side and immediately screen "oh but where is the 'neutral' Western media coverage for it?"
so that's what happened
one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega
"He can fix me" I say, as I point at lord shiva.
Here's BBC talking about a militant's immediate family (BBC's preferred noun for terrorists) were killed in this strike : https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjewen7w192o
His family that lives with him, mind you. They are fully aware and support his terrorist actions.
Here is his wikipedia page, which also calls him a militant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masood_Azhar
I am so sick of people going around saying 'OmG InDia Has StaRTed WaR. It Is ATtacKiNg InNocenTs'. Freaking it never did? it has attacked on The Terrorist BASE CAMPS. And about the children dying do you think those children are not being trained to be a terrorist? Fucking hell. It was a precise attack not targeted at civilians but terrorists.
And to all those who say 'nothing can justify war' oh really? so what, you want us to just shut up while those terrorists invade...yes INVADE into our country kill the innocent and threaten our existence and we just shut up and be like 'oh okkk let's just endure this silently and they'll get bored of this'? dude outsiders really don't understand the severity of it do they. Bitch do you even realise that there are nearly 100...100! sleepers cells of Pakistani terrorists in Bangalore alone!! which is like one city. Now does it sound serious? now does it invoke fear of your existence? imagine there are nearly 100 sleeper cells or terrorists in your city who can launch an attack on you at any moment. Then? now shall we stay silent? now shall we talk about peace? no they must be gone. yes I do agree that we must not attack innocent civilians and I do hope that this won't turn into a full blown war. But the terrorists...an abomination to the world and infact their religion too. must be eradicated. Every play has turns to play. Pakistan played it first. And now it's our turn. It's only natural. Every action has an equal and Opposite reaction.
since these pro-terrorist activists always want some western media validation - here it is :
This paper carries plenty of anti-India rhetoric, so you can rest assured it meets your fake ass 'standards for neutrality'.
so that's what happened
one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega
PAKISTAN IS A TERRORIST STATE. PERIOD.
fatima aamer bilal, from coffin heart? bury me.
[text id: how did you get so close that i have to dissect you out from under my skin? / memory is a deathbed. remembrance is a grave. the memory of you is a scab that i keep picking so that it scars. a burn, a souvenir, something to claw at that claws back at me. / i refuse to be haunted by something less. / there's a sun-sized ache where your hands used to be. / and now that your place is empty, the blood in my heart pumps around nothing. / nothing. / nothing at all. / senseless circulation. / what am i to live for when i have made my body my casket? / where am i to go from here? / and i always knew longing had another name she wouldn't let me call her by — it's hunger. / my heart grew up to be far more starved than my stomach. / it's the things you learn in your childhood, from the words of your mother, from the hands of your father. / if your teeth do not graze my bones, i do not wish for you to kiss me. / how have i turned gentle love into such devastation? / such greediness? / i carry a coffin for a heart; everything i love must be buried. / plant your garden in the cracks of my skin—mud, gravel, everything. let my blood be water to cater to your needs. / terrible, terrible human, thinks barbarity and love are words of the same meaning. / a mad dog would be a far more gentle lover to the rocks being thrown at him. / and, my dear, i wouldn't ask you to fold me in the pages of your favorite book, just the embedment of fingers between my ribs. / how did you get so close that i have to dissect you out from under my skin? / GET CLOSER.]
Pakistani military targeting civilians in Jammu and Kashmir 💔
It's because we're not getting their hint. They're saying lives of the people who are the family of terrorists matter more than innocent civilian tourists. Why? Because Islam is the cool religion to follow, so what if a few of its followers are killing innocents unprovoked in Israel and India? So what if a few of its followers are grooming and raping children in the UK?
Don't you see some of them are not allowed to settle their own cities in the United States? Some people are racist towards some followers of Islam in some Western countries. So, other followers of Islam must be allowed to kill innocent civilians indiscriminately elsewhere. If you don't agree you are racist.
They get to feel cool and morally superior. So what if some innocent civilians somewhere else have to die for their kewl anti-establishment 'image'? Don't you know these woke lives matter the most? followed by Islamic extremist lives? The rest of the world comes after that.
Here's proof from their beloved BBC about the Terrorists's family: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjewen7w192o
And if you now want to come at me saying just because they are his immediate family who lives with him they aren't terrorism supporters or sympathisers I have a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in buying.
People online are such hypocrites because theyre mourning the loss of civilian life in Pakistan but I never saw a single tweet from them related to pahalgam💀💀
Hinduphobia and racism towards Indians has only gone up recently; it's just sad, honestly. They make up these false statistics about how India produces rapists when they're nowhere near the top of the list (hint: it's a problem with MEN, not Indians). They use it as an excuse to shit on Indians, and Indians, especially Hindus, tend to be passive in order to seem "secular." Fun fact: they don't give a shit if you're "secular;" you're not safe from their terrorism as we just saw. If we don't stand up for ourselves, how can we expect others to do so?
India did it again. Their cowardice is out of this world. Targeting a mosque? That too in the dead of night? Going the Israel route I see. Like master like pet ig.