Sorry for some of the AI-speakensese below, I'm using ChatGPT to clean up my words here
By "standards of neutrality," I mean the way some people claim to be neutral when discussing India-Pakistan issues but seem to automatically frame India’s actions—like defending its borders or responding to attacks—as “invading” or aggressing against Pakistan. It’s like their baseline for “neutral” assumes India is always the instigator, ignoring context like cross-border militancy or provocations. I’m calling out that double standard where “neutrality” feels skewed against India.
I meant to share the NY Times article as a source with this standard of neutrality for people who read the posts that show India's side and immediately screen "oh but where is the 'neutral' Western media coverage for it?"
so that's what happened
one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega
Pakistani military targeting civilians in Jammu and Kashmir 💔
India did it again. Their cowardice is out of this world. Targeting a mosque? That too in the dead of night? Going the Israel route I see. Like master like pet ig.
Aloo Palak on the other hand is fab.
Hot take?? Maybe??
But Idc much for Palak Paneer.
Like it’s so mid.
It's morally reprehensible to expect the price of peace to always be Indian lives.
I don't care if you hate 'pajeets' or whatever the newest slur you guys have cooked up for Indians is. The current world order has decades of agreement on the fact that all innocent lives matter equally.
So no, you can't chill and feel good about giving us thoughts and prayers while my people die horrid deaths just so your feelings are protected.
We don't like that civilians on the adversary's side are dying either. But no reasonable country is going to sign off on its own citizens continuing to die at random because some malcontents amongst its neighbours just want to see them die. Don't hold us to moral standards you yourselves don't meet.
I’ve always believed in peace. I still do. I don’t dream of war. I don’t find glory in bloodshed. And I certainly don’t believe revenge heals grief. But what happens when the very peace you’re protecting is the reason you keep losing your people? What happens when the other side doesn’t believe in peace at all?
This blog isn’t written out of hatred. It’s written out of heartbreak, confusion, and the raw frustration of watching the same pattern play on loop - a terrorist attack, innocent lives lost, silence from the world, and once again, India is told to be “mature,” “calm,” and “restrained.”
How many Pulwamas? How many Pahalgams? How many coffins wrapped in our tricolour will it take before the world understands that peace without accountability is just a pause before the next tragedy?
India has tried. Again and again. Diplomatic talks, bilateral agreements, backchannel negotiations, and yet, terrorist camps continue to thrive across the border. How long are we expected to act like it’s not happening? And more importantly, why must we always be the ones trying?
Yes, I am anti-war. Yes, I believe in dialogue. But don’t confuse that with weakness. Because defending your people is not the opposite of peace ,it is the very foundation of it. What India did with Operation Sindoor wasn’t about revenge. It was about drawing a line , a line that should’ve been drawn long ago.
And let's address the said "diplomatic peace mediation" : the hypocrisy of international response. IMF loans flowing into a country that has harboured, sheltered, and at times even celebrated known terrorists. Social media giants gag Indian voices calling out terrorism, but conveniently stay silent when the hate flows the other way. Neutrality? Really? Or is it just comfortable indifference?
No, I don’t hate Pakistani civilians. I never will. But I will not pretend that both sides are equally innocent. I will not chant "peace" if it comes at the cost of more Indian blood. Because that’s not peace. That’s surrender.
India has done enough. Now, India is doing what it must. And if the world won’t understand that , maybe it never really cared.
I write this as someone who aches every time a soldier doesn’t return home. As someone who still wants peace , but not the kind that requires us to die for it.
Jai hind 🇮🇳
If Pakistan didn't want a war why were their literal Ministers threatening India with nuclear strikes on international media BEFORE the precise (very much non-nuclear) strikes by India?
I’ve been blocked by OP but here’s the post -
P.s Also op is so ignorant of the war mongering side of their nation. I’ve literally seen Pakistani media and Pakistani Islamists giving threats to nuke India.
I’ve seen Pakistani islamists discussing which Indian actresses they will take as captives (mal e ganimat) once the war breaks out.
Y’all aren’t even ready to see your own reality.
For fucks sake stop putting ignorant shit in these tags.
And also what I find hilarious is Terrorists coming in to Indian borders, attacking tourists, fucking civilian tourists (Hindus), telling them to recite Kalma or whatever that is to prove they’re Muslim, checking their Penis to see if they’re circumsised, and then killing 27 people. India attacking the same terrorist camps is such a problem? Go die 💀
Also self care SUCKS most of the time. Like it’s not fun at all. It’s doing the stuff you don’t want to, like cleaning your room, submitting that form, going to the gym that first time, having that conversation you avoided or making that call. It’s doing stuff that lets you unwind and stop worrying, and most of the time, that involves confronting and overcoming something you really would rather avoid.
since these pro-terrorist activists always want some western media validation - here it is :
This paper carries plenty of anti-India rhetoric, so you can rest assured it meets your fake ass 'standards for neutrality'.
so that's what happened
one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega
Here's BBC talking about a militant's immediate family (BBC's preferred noun for terrorists) were killed in this strike : https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjewen7w192o
His family that lives with him, mind you. They are fully aware and support his terrorist actions.
Here is his wikipedia page, which also calls him a militant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masood_Azhar
I am so sick of people going around saying 'OmG InDia Has StaRTed WaR. It Is ATtacKiNg InNocenTs'. Freaking it never did? it has attacked on The Terrorist BASE CAMPS. And about the children dying do you think those children are not being trained to be a terrorist? Fucking hell. It was a precise attack not targeted at civilians but terrorists.
And to all those who say 'nothing can justify war' oh really? so what, you want us to just shut up while those terrorists invade...yes INVADE into our country kill the innocent and threaten our existence and we just shut up and be like 'oh okkk let's just endure this silently and they'll get bored of this'? dude outsiders really don't understand the severity of it do they. Bitch do you even realise that there are nearly 100...100! sleepers cells of Pakistani terrorists in Bangalore alone!! which is like one city. Now does it sound serious? now does it invoke fear of your existence? imagine there are nearly 100 sleeper cells or terrorists in your city who can launch an attack on you at any moment. Then? now shall we stay silent? now shall we talk about peace? no they must be gone. yes I do agree that we must not attack innocent civilians and I do hope that this won't turn into a full blown war. But the terrorists...an abomination to the world and infact their religion too. must be eradicated. Every play has turns to play. Pakistan played it first. And now it's our turn. It's only natural. Every action has an equal and Opposite reaction.
Donald Trump just posted that India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire.