Does a trans woman who transitions and goes completely stealth, like SRS, voice training, cis-passing, updated legal docs, etc. become tme? If she can be inspected nude and people would assume she was cis then would transmisogyny even be able to be applied to her? Genuine question.
that used to be like the way trans women were expected to live and the risk of being exposed as transfem still hung over them so like. yes.
we did NOT have a period of discourse about how 'if trans women don't pass as women, but they do pass as men, they don't pass as men - they pass as 'queer' or 'other'' for yous to fucking go 'if trans men don't pass as men, which they're privileged for if they do, then they pass 100% as cis women, which they're privileged for when they do'
like SHUT UPPPPPPP I DID NOT PASS AS A CIS WOMAN EVERYONE THOUGHT I WAS A DYKE/TRANNY/QUEER. I NEVER PASSED AS 'WOMAN' I PASSED AS 'FREAK OF NATURE'. I WAS BARELY TREATED LIKE A HUMAN BEING LET ALONE A WOMAN
"the best way to screw jkr over is by making her characters queer!" actually. The best way to screw jkr over is to stop engaging with the property she still profits off of and read a different fucking book
Being lgbtqia does not automatically make you queer. Not being cishet doesn’t automatically make you queer. Queer is who you are, what you do, what you believe in, how you act. Queerness is lived.
it’s so hard and weird being pro para and anti transid because you’ll get lumped under “radqueer”
like how tf are “kinksters should be allowed to exist and people with paraphilic disorders should face less stigma so they can get the help they need” and “it’s okay to identify as another race” the same opinion 😭😭😭😭😭
do people not understand that the point of legalizing sex work is regulating sex work. so that sex workers can like, be legally protected if they experience violence and such violence can be prevented by putting legal guard rails in place. instead of our current system that leaves sex workers with no recourse or protection
funny how sexist men who beleive in separate but equal gender essentialism are always like 'its not bad that women and men are different :)) women aren't lesser :)) theyre better with children and emotions and social stuff :))'. they never say shit like 'women are more likely to get a college degree, women are just more intelligent than men and that's okay :))))))))))'
>post made by someone that commonly demonizes trans women that's a dunked screenshot and intentionally misconstrues what the trans woman op was saying to demonize her: 2,000+ notes
>post a trans woman makes showing the aforementioned transmisogynist agreeing with a terf that a trans woman is a "genderist" and should kill herself: >1000 notes.
>post where the transmisogynist gives a bullshit apology, "I didn't know what genderist means even though it's only used by terfs to mock trans people": 12 notes
This site really is the transmisogyny hub of the internet huh
Hey, here’s a concept. What if we stopped saying “but autistic people CAN do all those things” (erasing high support needs) and instead started saying “not being able to do those things doesn’t impact someone’s value as a person nor does it make it okay to commit eugenics”.
Some women are conditioned to be fragile and weak, and to believe that it's a sin to outperform a man. Her feminism would involve allowing women to be strong.
Some women are expected to be strong at times when they can't. Her feminism would involve reassuring her that it's okay to not be strong.
Some neurodivergent people are raised to believe that they're too stupid to ever amount to anything. Their disability activism would involve reassuring them that they're capable.
Some neurodivergent people are raised to believe that they're smart and gifted, and are expected to live up to impossible standards. Their disability activism would involve allowing them to fail, make mistakes, be stupid, etc.
Some children are constantly reminded "you're the child, I'm the adult" in order to deny their autonomy. Their youth rights activism would involve treating them like an adult at times when they feel ready for it.
Some children are treated like adults in order to justify increased expectations or to downplay abuse against them. Their youth rights activism would involve allowing them to be a child.
There is no one-size-fits-all solution to oppression. Each individual person's experience is different. Whatever trauma is caused by their oppression, the activism should focus on undoing it.
Feel free to ignore. This is my “old man yells at cloud” blog, so, let’s see where this shit goes.Qualifications aka basic biographical info: I’m a white queer adult in America and nothing else is any of your business
68 posts