Can you guys stop sending me asks about perisex people identifying as AFAB transfems / AMAB transmascs (like as in AGAB is part of the identity + based on stereotypes about what transfems/transmascs look like)
That is not what my posts regarding ISIG-experiencing intersex trans people are about. I am not going to talk about that. No I don't care if you are arguing against or in support of this. Stop sending me asks about perisex people in regards to my posts about intersex people.
I found a lost 1988 handbook from Coalitions for America, a right-wing think tank founded by the man who started The Heritage Foundation and ALEC. The document tells readers how to fight gay rights legislation and, as you’ve already guessed, it’s almost the exact blueprint used against trans people. I digitized it for the first time here: transreads.org/defeatgayrights/
Since the 1960s, the right has spent unprecedented time, effort, and cold hard cash to convince the public that treating oppressed people with basic dignity is unfair to them. We still see this 1988 "special privileges" argument in practice against trans people today.
Can someone's transition harm other people? Of course not. But the far-right wants you to believe so. Instead of spreading actual disease, this time we're spreading social contagion. Instead of divorce, we have "trans widows" and "broken families."
Israelis attack humanitarian aid trucks headed to Gaza.
إسرائيليون يهاجمون شاحنات المساعدات الإنسانية المتوجهة إلى غزة
If I may add to the discussion, I think a big issue with online activism is that people are so concerned with looking like a good person that they don't understand the reasons why someone might do something that technically goes against leftists principles. It's so easy to judge someone for not boycotting certain establishments that are objectively bad (and I'm all for boycotting if possible don't get me wrong!) but people often seem to forget that not everyone has the means to boycott. Where I live, the only way I can get basic necessities is often through Amazon or other big retail chains. I'm not proud of it but I literally don't have a choice right now. Like you and a couple of the other anons have said, a big issue with online activism is that people are so concerned with doing things that they believe are the markers of a good person that they forget that part of being a good person means being open to conversations and understanding why people do or don't do things. And this includes the people they have deemed as "bad people."
Yes that is a good point! 'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism' is not an excuse to never even try to be ethical in your choices, but it's also not actually a progressive position to demonize people with no effort put into understanding their practical, structural realities.
I wish we treated gender-affirming surgery with the excitement periodicals gave it in the 1950s. This November '58 article is so thrilled that doctors had finally invented effective genital surgeries that the editors dedicated several pages to the breakthrough. Read the full Tempo Magazine article here.
Here's my fkn' hangup: The guy with the bow tie shot up FSU and was killed! The guy with the spectacles on killed two people and injured five! He's still alive! Why? I know the answer! I dare anybody else to admit the answer! And wouldn't you know it! The goofy looking dude is the son of a cop! Just exercising his second amendment rights I'm sure! We'll see him at a dinner party with Trump, Vance, Musk, and Kyle Rittenhouse by this weekend...!
(via Elon Musk stealing from children : r/RealTwitterAccounts)