Why Do We Have To Share A Planet With These Things.

Least pedophilic TIM

"Why can't you just play along?" "Why not just affirm people if that’s what they want?" "What’s so hard about just being nice?" Because I’m not going to be a prop in someone else’s misogynistic kink.

women who use tiktok i am talking to you directly. yall gotta stop engaging in this girl math women shouldn’t vote shit. it’s not a silly ironic joke men mean that and they are making fun of you. listen to me. call them out when you see it happen. show the kids who use that bastard app that it’s not okay to make jokes like that. stop being part of the problem and stand up for yourselves

You could just stop replying. Would you like for me to block you now? So you can finally rest and breathe easy?

“You will never be a woman” lmao it’s nice to be affirmed as a trans man. Transphobia failed successfully

Homophobic male violence isn’t funny. These are the same men who would beat a woman like this for dressing “immodestly” or rejecting their buddies. You should be able to express yourself however you want without fear of being attacked by a dozen men.

A transgender man who went to Morocco was beaten by Moroccans

why can't i stop laughing😂😂😂

Six times??

Not trans. Not a drag queen.

CLOCK IT

ok, for those of you who don't know, jk rowljng donated £70k to an organisation of Scottish women who wanted the legal definition of a woman to be based on biological sex alone in the uk. today they had this ruled for in court.

the legal definition of a woman in the uk is now based purely on biological sex, likely preventing trans people from changing their sex on legal documents. we are still apparently protected from discrimination though.

the worst part of this is that news reports have been treating this as a good thing. jk rowling is painted as an amazing person in school assemblies. after doing not only what she does on twitter, but actively funding the discrimination of trans people.

just look at how many members these misogynist subreddits have.

The small text quotes are the descriptions (or excerpts from the descriptions/rules) of each subreddit, as posted by the creators/moderators.

r/womenarethings -> 600k members. "Women are things. Objects. They should be enjoyed, used, and tested to see what all they can do."

r/DegradeThisPig -> 104k members. "A subreddit for fat ugly FEMALE pigs to display themselves... Misogyny, rape fantasies, race play, body shaming, degrading, humiliation & tasks/punishment"

r/Miso_Paradise -> 171k members. "Things that are okay to post: misogyny, CNC, abuse, watersports, pet play, DDLG, raceplay."

r/misogynyKINKmemes -> 172k members. "We are talking explicit misogyny-kink-memes. Not eveyones kind of sugar, that's for sure." [sic]

r/womenSupportsMisogyny -> 188k members. "If you are into female inferiority and love women who supports it you are in the right place." [sic]

r/FemaleInferiorityCap -> 257k members. "Here you can post captions about incest, raceplay, rough and forced sex, humiliation and degradation. As long as they comply with the main theme of the sub. Keeping women in a position of objectification, sexualization, and inferiority."

r/MisogynyGoneWild -> 274k members. "If female inferiority/male supremacy turns you on, you're in the right place."

r/MisogynisticLife -> 429k members. "A safe place where the ideas of misogyny are discussed." [It's a porn community, not a discussion community.]

r/DegradingHoles -> 1.1 million members. "For women who love being degraded and men who have a kink for degrading. Post yourself and those beautiful holes."

r/painal -> 378k members. "...there has to be obvious (hopefully vocal) discomfort."

r/FaceofPain -> 255k members. "According to some Pornhub stats many users focus on the women's face during sex scenes, we do the same here. There is a little bit of "face of pain" in all mainstream porn."

This is disgusting and these subreddits should all be banned.

On April 16th 2025 the US federal government has proposed to change the interpretation of the endangered species act so that it no longer protects habitat.

This is open for public comment until the end of May 19th. Please comment and make your voice heard.

Wildlife need their habitat. If the ESA redefines harm so that habitat is no longer protected, the implications for wildlife would be catastrophic.