Ah, That Would Explain Why You Said Surcoat, I Was A Little Confused By That. This Is A Far More Wearable

Been thinking a bit on the controversies around harry potter's author, since I read a bit of fanfic, and, well - in recent years, I have to come to the opinion that the best possible way to get at someone is to turn their own work against them.

And, well, like, besides which, while don't give her more money of course, its clear that the supposed political stratagem of telling folk to never engage her works is pure foolishness.

(And its not like American schools actually teach critical thinking anymore; I may of dropped out of high school, but it was in what's generally called a "middle upper class" neighborhood, which I have since come to learn means working upper class, so from what I hear, that's more than most are getting, and I didn't get any critical thinking in that time.)

Back to the point of writing this - and I know its possible I just missed this happening - why not call her by the least traceable name of the main villain? Ya know, you know who. Don't hyphenate it or anything, I don't even recommend capitalization - in fact, if its not clear that she's the one your talking about without reading a sentence or two around it, the best analytics *these* days won't be able to filter it out from the (admittedly few, so it may be for the best to use those more often too) other uses of you know who.

Needs more food. If bomb is edible, probably more bomb; else, probably some chicken.

hey guys, what do you think of my dinner?

(choose your words carefully)

Okay, why can I still see the shape in the decolored version of D? The others are maybe at best but D is very clear.

colorblindness check! make sure you can see all of the shapes in the circles; if not, that might mean you've lost some of your ability to see color!

Not previous fellow, but no - floor's oo is pronounced the same as the o in or.

That makes much more sense than anything involving "eye" - those are basically the two that I would decide between. If they were on the poll.

I remember this one! It's that there's an XX chromosomes only mutation (much less strict to sex than folk tend to expect, but a very strong tendency) that can cause an expanded range of colours to be seen. IRC, it tends to be an issue in the more concrete art forms, as picking colours based partially on colours others don't see makes for art that looks odd to everyone else.

Warriors: Wake up! The sun has already risen!

Danny: What do you want me to do? Photosynthesis?

So, I've been thinking about what I've seen here, and, like, all the halfas (and Dan) have related themes, don't they? Like - Lab accident, Lab accident, Lab Eithics Issue, Probably Both.

And, like, ya know, 'scientist that is actually already dead' is a thing of haunted and sometimes overrun laboratories, and scientist's kid that is already dead is also fairly common. Not like you encounter either in every go, but, like...

Vlad, Danny, Dani and debatably Dan are all, like... fairly standard laboratory ghosts. The most normal-looking ones in the entire setup. May or may not do something like folding over in half and screeching at you depending on their mood and your vibe. Ya know?

“Be curious about what you’re writing about” is not stock Common Writing Advice but it really, really should be. There are a lot of written works that fail due to the authors just being obviously incurious about what they are writing about.

HAPPY IDES OF MARCH