It's Not Even (looks Up Word) A Particular Kind Of Oar, Or A Vessel Propelled By That Type Of Oar.

The Ocean, Me, MS Paint, 2022

Bocchi of Everything

Question: how did you get the link to agree with the claim? This is a one question quiz. Naturally, that means it is probably based on some obscure lore, so I trust you, but how?

hello homestuck kinnies that live in my computer

i finally went ahead and made a classpect quiz based on my personal conception of how things work. that means it's probably one of the more accurate classpect quizzes out there. consists of two parts. 20 questions total. go take it, share it, argue about it, whatever. have fun.

This statement makes sense to me. Quite frankly, my issue with the posts in question, except for one case where your blaming pro-endos for stuff that I know the pro-endo community helped the previous primary fronter unlearn after she learnt it from certain anti-endos claiming relevant trauma, is that they cap off with, or otherwise include, typically in essence, “QED endos aren’t real”.

Also, thanks for the reminder that now that we’re properly active we probably should at least have non-anon asks on? Yeah. Not that the others are active much, but...

The only thing here I’m willing to contend is the “not a comparable experience”. Irregardless of deeper dissimilarities, the experiences are similar enough that people who would wind up deciding their Endogenic are decently likely to run into Traumagenic communities and vise-versa, and there’s no real way to stop that beyond having a shared community on the surface level built to filter people to the relevant community via private links - which is the cited reason that when the non-disordered systems community tried to split off its terms wound up in the disordered systems community. (Its also the cited reason that both sometimes wander into tulpamancy spaces, though I’m told that tends to resolve a bit quicker - and tulpamancers get a lot less upset about terminology theft!)

Bluh, IDK how to really shorten that, and its not got real evidence in there, more so stating my opinion.

Anyhow, I had an actual next statement before I thought of that statement and shall now go onto it. While in retrospect I can see how it would be a problem, I had expected DMs. This is because we’ve seen other traumagenic systems attacked by anti-endos on the basis that they can’t be real, and I have what I’m pretty sure is a reasonable level of fear over that, since the system I’m in is *weird*.

@niavirrivain because of the stalking and harassment I'm currently going through, I'm not comfortable responding to the comments and giving out my main. I was going to send you an ask, but you have those turned off, so a post it is.

I am, for all intents and purposes, endo neutral at this point. I don't care what endos are doing in their corner of the internet. My blog and posts at this point specifically discuss sources and myths in regards to the DSM and DID/OSDD. I don't debate the existence of endos anymore, but I do point out that proof of their existence isn't going to come from the DSM, and it's not a comparable experience to DID/OSDD.

Very often this involves an anti endo stance within posts and syscourse. My stance, though, doesn't negate the sources or truth. In other words, just because someone doesn't like my stance, doesn't mean the post about the cultural exclusion (for example) is wrong. Worded from an anti endo standpoint? Yes, but the main point that the exclusion isn't meant for endogenic systems still stands.

Anyone, regardless of stance or origin, is welcome to send me asks about clarifying, explaining, or debunking sources. I encourage people to send me new sources to look at. It's up to you to take that information and make your own informed decision, and it doesn't matter who or what you are, I will help you understand things if you ask.

Having of been exposed to an unpleasant quantity/intensity of mind control kink content, the first quote explains the overall statement.

i feel like it's difficult to say any character in utdr is treated "too jokingly" to be seen as serious when one of the most harrowing and tragic characters across both games is also someone who has canonically screamed about how you can milk him

I'm pretty sure the Elder Scrolls one is the reason sunlight harms vampires... But that's also just normal.

>fantasy universes where celestial bodies look normal but the lore says they're actually just illusions / magic / otherwise not real

Surprising, given that the essence of mischievous poll responses has been defined for this purpose as purposeful and wrong, despite the capacity of truth to fulfil the purpose of mischief.

Between "for fuck sake" and "for fuck's sake", it's the latter, but it is my understanding that a paragraph+ best summarised as 'for fucks' sake, why?' is better than either. Scale number of paragraphs to how annoyed you are, and how likely they are to have a decent reason.

Trying to avoid insulting them while getting the point of the swearing across anyways is better, especially if you can deploy the correct number of paragraphs, and especially if they aren't actually insulted.

coworker moment 👍