Smth little that I did to combat my underwhelmness
Aiura is always watching out for her boyfriends
Harry potter x hijack au when i finish the HP series or tmnt x saiki k au when im not busy
Queerplatonic butterfly I made bc why not
After Saiki Kusuo falls in a mysterious portal made by his powers, he encounters two children that show him an entirely new world. Will he be able to get home? Read and find out!
(that last sentence is a lie - I'm not sure yet either)
Saiki Kusuo is transported into the world of Percy Jackson and must fight the Gods with the help of Will and Nico.
**SPOILERS**
New Tags:
Athena, Clarisse La Rue, Aiura Mikoto, Toritsuka Reita
Amputation, temporary amputation (don't ask)
I GOT HIM!!!! I GOT THE BOY!!!!!!
Well, not really finished it. I'm definitely gonna add more questions and maybe more characters, but I was impatient to get it out so I've published it anyway.
Worse. They were French.
"Congratulations, Madame. It's a boy!"
"How should we name him, Mon Cherie?"
"Well I was thinking we should name him Marie-Joseph Paul Roch Gilbert du Motier De La Fayette Marquis De Lafayette."
"Babe, You're a genius!"
"I KNOW RIGHT! I didn't knew which name to pick so decided to put them all in one because I'm so quirky in SUCH aristocratic wayđ"
"Je t'aime, chienne."
"Je t'aime aussi, connard."
And then they both kiss.
No but seriously, Were his parents fucking high when they were naming him? đ
"I hope you understand why I invited you to my office," Matsuzaki said calmly. Kongou just stared at him defiantly.Â
"No, teach. I don't," he all but spat, his face twisted in annoyance.
"Kongou, I wanted to talk to you about your grades in Japanese. You're seriously lagging behind." Kongou rolled his eyes.
"I'll try harder. Is that all?"Â Matsuzaki quieted and peered at the student before him. Finally, he nodded, and Kongou stood abruptly and stalked out.
Matsuzaki glanced down at the poem in front of him, Kongou Tsuyoshi written at the bottom. Maybe next time, he'd confront him.
An excerpt from a project I'm working on:
Saiki knew it would be a bad day when he woke up.
First, he had a premonition and had to stop the gas station from blowing up because of a stray rock. Then, he got a call from Kuusuke, letting him know he would be over next weekend. After that, his limiter had fallen out, and heâd gotten stuck in a time loop for hours, all before breakfast.Â
Finally, to top it all off, he had to take his younger sister to school with him.
âPlease, Kusuo, honey?â his mother pleaded, eyes sparkling. âI promised Hana I would see her band today, and Kuriko doesnât have anyone to watch herâŚ
âFine,â he said tiredly, looking over at his 5-year-old sister, devouring pancakes at a concerning rate. He met his motherâs eyes again, quickly averting his gaze when he saw her glistening eyes.Â
âOh, Ku, thank you so much! Iâll get you some coffee jelly on my way home.â Good grief. He turned away, going through a mental checklist before school. He had all his bags, his homework was done, and Nendouâs favorite ramen shop was closed for the morning, so he should be fine
A slight tug on his pant leg made him look down to see Kuriko staring up at him, mouth wiped clean of syrup and her light pink hair in a ponytail. Her hair was longer than his in girl form - it reached all the way down to her shoulders.
âKusu-kun, when are we going?â she whined, staring up at him with large, lamp-like eyes. Saiki let out a huff.
âRight now,â he said, opening the door and gesturing for her to go before him. She skittered outside, setting off in a random direction that was definitely not the way to get to PK Academy.Â
Good grief.
âKuriko!âÂ
â
After teleporting them both back to his house (no, Kuriko, they couldnât teleport straight into the school; people would see them), they set off along the stone-ladden path to the academy, Kuriko leaping from stone to stone, determined not to touch the cracks.
âKusu-kun, are we theeere yet?â she whined back at him, the fourth time in the last fifteen minutes. Could psychics get aneurysms?
âFive more minutes,â he said blandly. It wasnât the truth â without teleportation, they had about ten more minutes until they arrived at PK, but Kuriko didnât need to know that.Â
Of course, he was so focused on making sure Kuriko didnât kill herself by accident that he forgot to watch out for other life-threatening dangers.Â
âBuddy!â Nendou called, slinging an arm around his shoulders. Saiki nearly punched him in the face, but restrained himself at the last second.Â
âNendou!â Kaidou called out, panicked. âYouâll kill him!â Good luck with that.
âWhat? Buddy never gets hurt!â Nendou boasted, finally looking down at the small child that was staring at him in abject fascination. âHuh? Whoâs this?â
We read Flowers for Algernon, and this discussion ensued. We now have to write an essay about it, and I am sure I must be missing something, because I can't find any reason to side against increasing intelligence.
To set the stage, we debated whether to increase intelligence in real life. This means that any potential effects of intelligence-enhancing surgery inside Charlie Gordon's universe (i.e., the intelligence wearing off) are not applicable. In this debate, we are referring to intelligenceânot knowledge. In this context, intelligence refers to IQ, while knowledge refers to information. This means Elon Musk's Neuralink, while not irrelevant, is not the main focus of this argument.
If an argument is good, I will do my best to admit that.
These are in no particular order.
Starting off strong with this interesting point, those against increasing intelligence argue that increasing intelligence would eliminate neurological differences between people. In other words, it would get rid of stupid people.
The amount of intelligence someone has is not 'diversity.' If everyone had the same IQ, we would not all be the same because we still have our personalities -- and that's only touching on neurological differences. There are plenty of other ways we differ.
Personally, I don't understand this argument. Just because something is of more value to your success doesn't mean everything else doesn't matter.
Imagine you're on your way to class. You'd want a pencil, right?
Well, you don't actually <em>need</em> that pencil. You could just take the lead, and it would still work -- maybe not as well, but it would still work. The wood casing around the lead isn't the most important part of the pencil, so, under this logic, it's unnecessary.
This is a much better point than the last two, but it's still not infallible.
While sophisticated crime, such as bank robberies and pharmaceutical cover-ups, would increase, so would the effectiveness of our methods of battling it. If everyone had increased intelligence, we would still be fighting on an even playing field.
For example, while Isaac Newton was very intelligent, he was also a misanthrope. People can have prejudices and incorrect opinions despite being very intelligent.
This is true -- to a point. While some people would still be caught up in their prejudice, increased intelligence will let more people see through it. It doesn't make much sense to use this as a stand-alone point
See this, y'all? THIS is how you make a good argument. Talk about stuff like this instead of bringing up weird points about grit and diversity, and you'll be golden.
We need to solve a lot of things before we can make intelligence-enhancing technology available -- that's undeniable. However, this is the case with most medical procedures. The wealthier among us can afford expensive treatments to save their children's (or their) lives and give them a boost in life, while those with less money are left sitting in the dust.
It's not great, but it's the unfortunate reality. Adding another medical procedure to the mix wouldn't make much a difference.
I agree, however, that introducing intelligence-enhancing technology while we have such drastic class differences could be dangerous. It would give the rich a large advantage while middle and lower-class citizens would have a much harder time getting into the same universities as them because they have lower IQs.
See? This is a good argument. I will admit that -- this is one of the best points I've heard against it, and it's rarely brought up.
What do you guys think? I'm mostly limited to the evidence provided by my teacher, so I'm curious as to what some points you guys have are.
If I was unclear on anything, please let me know.
Sources for Arguments:
Intelligence Article
Grit Tedtalk (used as evidence for grit argument)
Anyway, it's 2:45 and I have school tomorrow, so I should probably go to bed. See y'all tomorrow!