It's God. The Yearning You Feel Is For God Plain And Simple. Research Orthodoxy

good evening why did dr. phil invite eli erlick, a confessed rapist (OF OTHER TRANS PPL), on his show

To give the least insane argument against this, Ambiance nice. Sometimes you can legitimately love the sensations of silk on your skin and soft flickering natural light while reading. Now the line for me would be how comfortable you actually are. The second you are wearing pore clogging gloop on your face or a weird ass ‘sexy’ pose, yeah thats just for the image. but yes I would much rather enjoy a wonderful meal in a fancy candlelit restaurant than inside a waffle house. Even if it was the same exact meal.

I feel like "romanticize your life" actually means "perform for an imaginary voyeur." Men don't do this shit.

We have agreed as a society that those under 25 are too reckless and stupid to rent a fucking car. But yeah go ahead and permanently change your entire endocrine system. A single state putting legal protections on that age group is *checks notes* genocide.

Literal motherfucking genocide!

I'm 25, but COVID years dont count I think.

the council has conferred and it has been decided that the most painful ages to happen to a person are 12, 17, 19, and 23

So my female only filianic server is up. DM me if you’re interested.

if you’re going to make these assumptions that non-asexual people are “sex-happy,” have sex frequently or at all, have uncomplicated relationships to sex, are sexually attracted to strangers or other people they don’t have a strong bond with, etc., then you have to accept that there are TONS of people who fit your definition of asexual who are not part of any identifiable asexual community, who may not ever identify as asexual, who do not necessarily agree with any theories, politics, or systems of identification developed by asexual communities, but whose feelings and ways of relating to sexuality are just as valid as yours, and you have no way of knowing who they are. and when you assume that someone must not be one of these people, must embody every expectation you have about non-asexual people, solely because they do not identify as asexual, you are making very invasive and inappropriate assumptions about another person’s personal, private sexual feelings and that is not okay. and in particular when you do this to lgbt people, women, people of color, and especially people at the intersections of those groups, you are reinforcing ideas about their relationships to sexuality that play a significant role in their oppression.

And when we DO call men ‘boys’ it’s usually to let them not take responsibility ie, “boys will be boys”

When you call a woman a “girl”, you reinforce the infantilization of women as helpless, irrational, weak beings in need of protection. A diminutive term, “girl” denies a woman her adulthood, her maturity and her power. Notice the frequency in which we call men “men” or “guys” but call women “girls”. This is no coincidence. This use of language is rooted in sexism and it is disrespectful, patronizing and disempowering. A woman is not a female child. Stop calling women “girls”.

Wheat fields are more mystical than fields of other crops. You are 7,000 times more likely to meet an old god or see a portent of doom in a wheat field than in a field of like… soybeans.

my only wish is that once guillermo does turn into a vampire he becomes just as stupid as the rest of them I think being an absolute idiot just comes with the vampire curse

( @ledians )