Malthusianism? That Malthusianism, the "theory" that human populations always eventually grow to the level that resources and technology can sustain, thus perpetuating a long-term equilibrium of general poverty, and that permanent improvements in standard of living are impossible? Repeated uncritically in my Roman history book, published in the year of Our Lord Hatsune Miku 2012?
At last! Something the socialists, libertarians, feminists and Catholics can all agree on! Someone give ol' Mathus a medal!
Some economists believe Malthusianism has some credibility, at least in limited contexts. Others think it's been wholly discredited. I've linked the Wiki article above so you can judge for yourself.
Personally, I'm very skeptical. I don't see why human birth rates would automatically, and always, increase to match what the environment's resources can support. Global fertility has been dropping for a while, and most estimates now expect the population to start leveling off around 10-12 billion. The effect is even more pronounced when you look at industrialized countries that have gone through demographic transitions.
I also think the Malthusian model overlooks cultural factors that influence people's reproductive choices. E.g. many people in the USA delay having children due to time spent in college, building careers, and lack of paid maternity leave. And many people I know choose not to have biological children now that it's socially acceptable.
That's just my view. I can understand why Temín thought the Malthusian model might be more applicable for the agrarian society of ancient Rome. But since the point of his article was to introduce useful economic ideas for classicists to use in their work, I think he should have discussed the serious criticism Malthusianism has received, too.
(First excerpt from Peter Temín, "The Contribution of Economics," in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy, ed. Walter Scheidel.)
The mutuals were so right. Reading On Self-Respect by Joan Didion DOES stop you from losing your fucking mind
I'm enjoying The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy so far, but it's rather high level, and it's been a few years since I last studied economics. So, I picked up a little refresher. And read the whole thing in a day.
The Cartoon Introduction to Economics, by Grady Klein and Yoram Bauman, is very, very good.
Graphic novels are great for bringing dry subjects to life. Klein and Bauman's examples show that economics is about people making choices, and their choices affecting each other's lives:
And it helps put abstract concepts into concrete terms:
The text is funny and easy to follow, even if you hate math and know nothing about economics. I think it's a very good introduction to how capitalism is supposed to work, in theory. You can certainly criticize capitalism - I do - but these books will show you the nature of the beast that we're up against.
It's very difficult for an economics book to be politically neutral. But Klein and Bauman's work is factual, avoids strongly right-wing or left-wing slants, and they acknowledge systemic problems like colonialism, exploitation of poor communities, and climate change. They also offer a few suggestions for addressing these problems. The books are USA-centric but include examples from other countries, too.
Oh yeah, there's actually two books. One for micro-economics, and one for macro-economics.
Microeconomics looks at a single individual, business, or market. So volume one covers:
Marginal utility and cost
Supply and demand
Cost-benefit analysis
How markets self-organize and stabilize
Auctions
Risk
How interest rates work
Present vs. future value of a good
Information asymmetry
What makes a market competitive or not
Game theory, including the prisoner's dilemma and the tragedy of the commons
How taxation affects markets
Price and demand elasticity
Macroeconomics looks at an entire economy, or multiple economies, and how they interact. Volume two explores:
Gross Domestic Product
How to measure quality of life
Monetary policy and fiscal policy
Unemployment
Inflation and deflation
Classical vs. Keynesian economics
Free trade vs. protectionism
Aging populations
Currency exchange
Foreign aid and exploitation
Climate change and pollution
Addressing global poverty and inequality
Strategies for mitigating economic crashes
However, these books do not cover:
Marxist and socialist views of economics
Effects of colonialism and discrimination
The role of unions
Social safety nets
Indigenous and traditional societies' economics
Behavioral economics
Personal finance
Stock markets
What causes economic bubbles and crashes
And probably more things I forgot
They're not a substitute for a real textbook or college course. But they're a great starting point, and a fun read.
The number one phrase I have adopted into my lexicon from ACD Sherlock Holmes is all the times Watson says “I cudgeled my brains” when he’s trying and failing to think through a mystery. Huge mood, deeply relatable, I too spend far too much time cudgeling my brains with no real result
if only cicero HAD chosen catullus for his son-in-law.
📺
From the ask game: 📺 - Favourite show?
It's gotta be Yes Minister, a British political comedy from the 1980s. It follows the newly-elected, party-unspecified minister Jim Hacker in his attempts to fix problems and survive government bureaucracy. Usually, he fails. Sometimes, this is for the best. He is a short-sighted, rather panicky politician, after all.
The writing, acting, directing, and humor are incredibly, consistently great, and it's held up remarkably well for its age. I think much of that is because the conflicts are based on real events and conflicts of interest, rather than putting down "the other side" or minorities. (When Jim says something ignorant, he is the butt of the joke.) This also makes the show pretty bipartisan. Even the main antagonist, Humphrey of the civil service, is likable, clever, and occasionally in the right.
If you watch it, get the original, not the remakes. Nigel Hawthorne and Paul Eddington are national treasures.
hey you're doing a great job, just remember: a semicolon can be used to combine two sentences where you might otherwise use a period; this allows you to create longer and longer run-on sentences
reading any dostoyevski book your main takeaway will always be yeah no i see why every other author was in love with this miserable russian man . and justice prevails slow and greets you when youve changed too much to still be in need of its comfort
I'm reading about the Victorian Aesthetic movement and I was violently reminded of...
...Sherlock Holmes's 'rose monologue' from The Naval Treaty, HI HELLO CAN ANYONE HEAR ME
when you start reading again and it's like oh. oh . the sun actually does still shine.
The basic reason for this sad state of affairs is that marriage was not designed to bear the burdens now being asked of it by the urban American middle class. It is an institution that evolved over centuries to meet some very specific functional needs of a nonindustrial society. Romantic love was viewed as tragic, or merely irrelevant. Today it is the titillating prelude to domestic tragedy, or, perhaps more frequently, to domestic grotesqueries that are only pathetic.
39 posts