19 I 2023
this week is kinda crazy
I have a complex analysis test on saturday and the professor said that it will cover the entire semester. thank god I might get away with not knowing anything about analytic number theory lmao
I had troubles sleeping lately, it takes me about 3-4 hours to fall asleep every day. I sleep a lot during the day and it helps a bit but I still feel half-dead all the time. every time I fall asleep my brain can't shut up about some math problem
for the algebraic methods course we were supposed to state and prove the analogue of Baer criterion for sheaves of rings. I was the only person who claimed to have solved this, so I was sentenced to presenting my solution in front of everyone. the assertion holds and I thought I proved it but the professor said that the proof doesn't work, here is what I got:
he said that we cannot do this on stalks and we have to define a sheaf of ideals instead. when I was showing this I had a migraine so no brain power for me, I couldn't argue why I believe this to be fine. whenever two maps of sheaves agree on each stalk they are equal, so if we show that every extension on stalks is actually B → M on stalks, then doesn't that imply the extension is B → M on sheaves?? probably not, but I don't see where it fails and I'm so pissed that I was unable to ask about it when I was presenting, now it's too late and this shit keeps me up at night
I enjoy sheaf theory very much and I can't wait to have some time to read about schemes, I have a feeling that algebraic geometry and I are gonna be besties
during some interview Eisenbud said that when deciding which speciality to choose one should find a professor that they like and just do what that professor is doing lol. I feel this now that I talked some more to the guy who taught us commutative algebra. since my first year I was sure that I will do algebraic topology but maybe I will actually do AG, because that's what he's doing. is having one brain enough to do both?
anyway I'm glad that my interests fall into the category of fashionable stuff to do in math these days. my bachelor's thesis is likely going to be about simply-connected 4-dimensional manifolds, which is a hot research topic I guess. I won't work on any open problem because I'm just a stupid 3-year, not Perelman, but it will be a good opportunity to learn some of the stuff necessary to do research one day
yes, this. taking photos of the blackboard and writing down only the "sketch" of the lecture usually does the trick for me: I have all the details I need but I'm able to actually listen
a thing that i didn’t understand as a student, that many of my students don’t understand, and that i still sometimes struggle to put into practice: taking the most detailed notes is not always the best way to learn the material. trying to write down every single thing a teacher (or other person who is presenting auditory information to you) says is not only slow but it also can easily stop you from being mentally present during the lesson, internalizing the main ideas and how everything fits together, which is what will actually help you learn the material.
I hate it when I am blessed with a new tumblr feature without my consent
Balance
What's the beef between engineers and physicists and even mathematicians.
Why physicists mock mathematicians: Because playing 51 dimensional chess against your own brain seems silly to us when there’s a whole cosmos to explore.
Why mathematicians mock physicists: The universe can only be understood because some nerd spent the time playing 51 dimensional chess and in the process they created some useful stuff for the physicists to steal and abuse the hell out of.
Why everyone mocks the engineers: π=e=3 is an abomination before God and those pencil pushing dorks make more money than us so we feel the need to vindicate our $75000 student debt.
“that sounds very hacky, but smart”
“i’m not sure where i’m going with this… its quite similiar to my life”
*Entire class and prof spends fifteen minutes trying to solve a problem before eventually giving up* “great work guys, that was some good debugging”
“is this a super big issue?” *longggg dramatic sigh* “… yes”.
Professor 1: “it’s still not working? um… okay, maybe you should… turn off your wifi and turn it back on again?“ Professor 2: "40 years of experience in networking and computing at its finest”
“whenever i’m doing my taxes, i never use the calculator app on my phone, i always just open up a notebook and use python and i think thats very brave of me”
“your life quality with improve when you use python 3 instead of python 2. your skin will improve and you’ll even sleep better”
“so this compiler doesn’t recognise cases, so if you’re really perverse, you could do Apple, aPple, apPle, appLe, applE, but if you do that then i’m going to kick you out”
“so, let’s give an example: "True = False”. Asides from causing the end of the world, much like dividing by 0, this will also cause an error”
“if you want to see my cat, i’ll show her. if you DON’T want to see my cat, too bad, cause I’m going to show you her anyway”
“today we will use three keywords: `if`, `else`, and their weird cousin `elif`.”
“if you want to type something else, like… uh, goodbye world? maybe? is that too dark? i think its too dark, so lets save that for later on in the year… by the way, have you been told about your exams yet?”
Professor : “is everything clear so far? shall i go faster?” Literally EVERYONE: “no! slower!“ Professor: "Slower?! you can go slow when you’re dead, you won’t need python then!”
“you can’t use functions as your variable names. for example, you can’t call this number "if”. i mean i don’t know why you’d use that as your variable name to begin with, but i’m not here to question your life, i’m here to teach you python”
“it’s probably not the most efficient but its just what came out of me so we’re running with it”
Part 1 | Part 2
“Netflix and chill?”
No, PDF and cry
today I learned that for a surface with boundary, which I believe we can say a straw is, the genus is equal to that of a 2-manifold obtained from attaching disks to the boundary. hence the straw has genus equal to that of a 2-sphere, which is 0, therefore a straw has 0 holes
also a straw is not homotopic to a torus I think, but rather to S¹, as it's a product of S¹ and a closed interval, which is contractible. a torus has the fundamental group S¹×S¹, thus they cannot be homotopy equivalent. buuut that requires the straw to be infinitely thin so maybe I'm too idealistic for this claim to hold and it is in fact equivalent to a torus
lmao I love math but I can't stop laughing at the fact that it took me two years of university to be able to have this discussion
I’m really into internet discourse but only pointless and stupid internet discourse like how many holes there are in a straw (it’s 2)
⁕ pure math undergrad ⁕ in love with anything algebraic ⁕
292 posts