Why I'm independent. Both are wrong and right in their own ways and nobody should be afraid to not pick a side. Vote for whatever you believe in <3
This post describes how I feel about politics perfectly
The liberal culture of perpetually walking on eggshells, fearing that whatever you say might offend somebody, or (alternatively) feeling like you are always a victim to everybody's microaggressions is extremely unhealthy.
The conservative culture of perpetually being rude under the guise of "just saying it like it is", completely disregarding that what you say might offend somebody, or entering into conversations always on the defense is extremely unhealthy.
People in both left and right political groups who fit within these behavioral patterns seem to operate off of getting high from feeling righteousness.
These behavioral trends in both groups breed authoritarianism, paranoia, ignorance, aggression, ideological purity, and black and white thinking.
Itâs been a few weeks since Roe vs. Wade was overturned by the Supreme Court. Itâs been the ideal goal for conservative lawmakers and groups. The case that got it overturned, Dobbs v Jackson Womenâs Health Organization, focused on Mississippiâs appeal of a lower court ruling that struck the stateâs law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy as unconstitutional. In Mississippiâs appeal to the Supreme Court, the stateâs district attorney asked the court not only to uphold its abortion ban but to overturn Roe vs. Wade. This marks the first time that the U.S has taken away a constitutional right entirely. The overturning got me wondering: Who was the woman who accomplished Roe vs. Wade in the first place?
Norma McCorvey, the woman âJane Roeâ at the crucial center of abortion rights, had flaws, as everyone does. In 1969 she became pregnant a third time and simply wanted an abortion. According to the NY Times, âââMcCorvey, a young single woman in Dallas, gave no thought to the fight for reproductive rights. She was barely getting by as a waitress, had twice given birth to children placed for adoption, and simply wanted an abortion. She later lied about getting pregnant, saying she had been raped. When, more than a decade later, she came clean and wished to join the movement she had come to represent in earnest, its leaders denied her a meaningful part in their protests and rallies. âI think theyâre embarrassed,â McCorvey told Texas Monthly in 1993, âThey would like me to be college-educated, with poise and little white gloves.ââ
Because of the fall of Roe, over 13 states in the United States have trigger laws that were put in place to go into effect, and it marks the first time in the countryâs history that the Court has taken away a constitutional right, not to mention many abortion clinics across the country have closed down. But this isnât the end: large companies like Disney, Meta, Apple Zillow, Buzzfeed, Amazon, Leviâs, etc., have offered compensation for their employees who seek abortion procedures. Dozens of elected prosecutors from over 29 states, territories, and Washington D.C, have released a statement, ââWe decline to use our officeâs resources to criminalize reproductive health decisions and commit to exercise our well-settled discretion and refrain from prosecuting those who seek, provide, or support abortionsâŚ.Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice; prosecutions should not be a part of that.ââ
This video occurred in March, and I think itâs important to hear from an actual doctor. When studying anthropology in school, I was taught to be unbiased and objective, which I tried to do in my past articles. But I cannot keep my objectivity, knowing many women across the states cannot get a safe abortion, especially as this doctor explains in the video, will continue to happen whether or not they are considered legal. Norma McCorvey may not have meant to start the fight for abortion rights when she decided to find lawyers, it is important to know that she started the fight, and it will continue to pave historically on!
Two useful additions: First: The Paradox Of Tolerance. Per Karl Popper: âUnlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them... We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law...â
Second: this rather instructive video by Innuendo Studios. (Transcript for the reading-inclined.) It succinctly encapsulates the origins and character of modern Conservatism, and how contrary to all assertions, intolerance appears to very much be an intended feature and not a bug.
Conservatives will be like âWhy are you holding me accountable for my bigoted beliefs? Whatever happened to tolerance???â
The inner-city crack epidemic is now giving birth to the newest horror: a bio-underclass, a generation of physically damaged cocaine babies whose biological inferiority is stamped at birth...[This is] a race of (sub)human drones ... [whose] future is closed to them from day one. Theirs will be a life of certain suffering, of probable deviance, of permanent inferiority. At best, a menial life of severe deprivation ... [T]he dead babies may be the lucky ones.
-Conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer in 1989.Â
People like to pretend there was a time when the American conservative was sane and not possessed by cruelty and a special kinda crazy.
Itâs not a myth. Itâs a lie. Itâs total bullshit.Â
Thatâs so called respectable (and soon to be deceased) conservative writer/thinker/fantasist/whatever the fuck Charles Krauthammer condemning an entire class of people when they were fetuses back in the much simpler and much more innocent year of 1989.Â
Only difference now is there is less sophistication. Less subtlety.Â
There were dog whistles before but now the dog whistles are replaced by screams and shrieks.Â
You could say something wicked this way comes but youâd be wrong.Â
Something wicked was always here and just leveled up the wickedness. Just made it nastier. Just made it harder to look at. Just made it make your ears bleed faster so you plug them and tell yourself itâs all gonna be okay.Â
See, we all gotta confront the possibility that it might not be okay.Â
it does not happen legally in America and plenty of other healthier countries, and I thought you pro choice types would support lives sacrificed for the greater good đ also you're quick to judge a conservative nation which really conservatism just means reserved; but want to ignore that Hitler was a communist which is an extreme way of socialism yay Bernie. pretty sure AMERICAN traditions are far different than Iran's.
Darling, I dont think Hitler was a communist. He was as Authoritarian as one, but had completely different ideas on how the market should be run. In fact, he felt threatened by communists and they were the first people he sent to camps and killed. I sure hope you made a typo and you meant Stalin, so that is what I will assume. Bernie believes in a more socialized society, not a communist one. He is a less extreme Stalin/communist, but if you use that argument Trump is just a less extreme Hitler/nazi. It goes both ways.