I Know It's Not Canon That's Why I'm Reading Fanfic Of It

Ok but like what was Agatha's plan for Billy?

The witches road was fake. She was planning on having the girls blast her so she could steal their magick but what about Billy? He was the one who asked Agatha to take him there. What was she planning on doing about the random teenager at her house?

Was she hoping the Salem Seven would have killed him? Would she have killed him?

you guys need to stop letting your hatred (or love for that matter) of certain media/celebrities/whatever get in the way of your ability to feel compassion, empathy and sympathy.

sorry but celebrity culture and some of you guy's hatred for it have made some of you get way too comfortable with bullying, encouragement of violence and other unacceptable actions.

There's been some discourse going around that tries to connect Neil Gaiman writing about problematic things and him being awful to mean that everyone who writes that kind of thing is also awful or should be placed under suspicion.

Correlation is not causation. You could just as easily blame the fact that he wrote about mythology and fairytales. It has the same amount of weight as blaming dark subjects.

The truth is, there have been tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of authors who write/have written about dark/problematic/complicated subjects who have never hurt a soul and who never will.

Now, you could say people who have endured trauma and abuse are more likely to write about dark subjects. I'm not positive but I think this bears out in statistics. But again, the vast majority of people who have suffered abuse and whose past abuse informs their writing do NOT go on to perpetuate that cycle of violence.

I know we all wish that predators were easy to spot. But if they were, they wouldn't be predators. They'd be criminals operating in broad daylight.

The disturbing fact is that truly bad people who operate for a long time are incredibly hard to spot. They survive by manipulating those around them into providing cover for them and carefully craft personas to make it difficult to accuse them of wrongdoing. They will also use fame and money as a shield and choose victims with the least ability to fight back.

Using what happened in your crusade against dark topics and your push for censorship in fiction is incredibly disrespectful to the victims and risks making writers part of a witch hunt.

It also makes it harder to spot actual predators because it perpetuates the idea that these people have easy tells. They do not. That's what makes them monsters.

In retrospect, can we pick out certain themes in his work that aligns with the allegations against him and hints at who he really was? Yes, but hindsight is 20/20. Someone else could have written about the same subjects and been a saint of a human being.

One of the reasons i believe TV shows being released today is not working as good as it did in the 2000's, especially when we're talking about remakes/spin-off's/ sequels, is that we are not allowed to have horrible people an part of the main characters group anymore.

Think about the big hits of the 200's-2010's tv show. Gossip Girl: Blair had beef with a 13 years old, cheated on Nate with Chuck, Serena slept with her best friends boyfriend, was part of the reason a teenager die, Dan was Literally a stalker, Chuck ... is Chuck Bass.

The New version kinda of had a shot with season 1, especially with Max, he was involved in 2 cheatings, was sleeping with his tracher and only tried to expose him after he felt personally wronged ( and even than he went to Gossip Girl instead of the cops). Max was the type of messy that tv Shows need.

Pretty Little Liars: The whole show is about the girls being blackmailed by A because of the things they did with Alison.

The O.C: The main character starts the show being arrested.

One Tree Hill: How many cheating storylines can you give your protagonist before people start liking his brother more?

The Vampires diaries: Damon raped Caroline. And pretty much all the main characters kill at least 2 people.

Shows being made in the last couple of years don't allow their main character or their friends to be imperfect people wich makes the series boring. Nathan Scott is one of the most loved character in one tree hill and he starts as a complet jerk.

Part of watching this shows is about seeing the characters become better, but this doesn’t happen if they start perfect.

Just like when people complain that disney doesn’t make villains anymore, how every "villain" ends being some misunderstood person. Every once in a while could make a good story but not movie for the last 4-5 years.

Sotrie need villains, a person for you to hate, for you to love to hate or hate to love.

#Bring Back Messy Characters

I understand that every social media has a diferent algorithm but i didn't expect to get such a crazy 180° on my two most used ones

Because when i was on Twitter, who is completely and perfectly crafted for you, i was happy in my little bubble on Jensen and Dean positivity/ fans BUT then i go to Tiktok and out of nowhere they hit me with a video of a guy who hates Dean and i'm like "Why did you think i would like something like this?" Was it because i liked a couple od edits of Sam? Does Tiktok think that liking Sam=Hating Dean? What i can say is that video didn't show up to me based on my saved videos 'cause that its mostly Dean and The Trickster/Gabriel

So was Billy super close with Alice because she was the one who saw both Willian Kaplan die and Billy Maximoff re-borning?

Poor Ralph he's super traumatized by Agatha but i'm so happy we got at least some answers on him

What is called when you're homesick from somewhere you never went?

I really don't understand some people obsession with teacher X studant romance. Its not cute its creepy

I really hope they give Billy a better suit for next projects bc this one is super ugly.

Like use the one with galaxies on the side (ik wich one rigth?) for his next suit up scene.

Jen, my lovely Jen, i'm so happy for her but i really hope we see her again.

I admit i was wrong. The road is fake, or was until Billy decided it was real (it's just so nice when people are creative with reality magick)

This stratospheric level of egoism is mindblowing and disturing to me.

As someone with diagnosed with PTSD, no, being deceived by an author you never met is not trauma. You can’t call every uncomfortable or painful experience trauma. You’re making the word lose impact and meaning.

"He violated us too" No. How tonedeaf can you be? How tactless? Making someone's else rape about you? No, you haven't been violated. He didn’t put his fucking hands on you. Those two experiences are not even remotely comparable, and the fact that you think they are is seriously worrying. You mentioned talking to your therapist about it— yeah, you really should.

"Time to grieve" no one died. The actual, real victims deserve to grieve the life and peace of mind they lost.

I'm not saying you can’t feel betrayed by an author you loved for a long time, but the least you could do is not make someone's else rape about you.