Yet... The most successful capitalist is one of the dumbest and most immature people in the world.
And Einstein supported socialism just saying.
Only the lowest IQs support communism. That's why they insist idiots are just as good as geniuses. They are idiots who believe no one is better than them.
Lmao do you hear yourself?
"Right-wing Nazi bullshit" Just say feminazi, it's quicker :)
""Not all men" is still bullshit when it comes to the original meaning of "All men" which is about how we have to be socially wary all (cis) men who are strangers."??
I mean. Yeah. Why shouldn't we care about our safety? Not just regarding strangers either honestly. Male friends and whatnot too are also usually misogynistic and/or can be harmful to women just because of how males are raised to view us as below them. Don't be delusional.
Also bro just shut up mr. "practicing Paraphiliac" lmao.
We used to make fun of people for saying "not all men" it was beautiful
i’m soo unfit i have 0 stamina it’s acc bad. but i also have very little motivation to change this. Tho i do Want to. abstractly
Also this is a plan to make it so anyone with a name change won't be able to vote, aka most married women. But sure, misogyny is gone in the US I guess!
From the source: "The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act could prevent many married women from being able to register to vote.
The act, reintroduced by Texas Republican Representative Chip Roy, is intended to amend the National Voter Registration Act to ensure that all people registering to vote are U.S. citizens. It would require people to present in-person documentation as proof of citizenship when registering to vote.
Much of the documentation listed under the SAVE Act is based on having a birth certificate that matches the person registering to vote. However, as many as 69 million married women in the United States have changed their legal name since getting married, meaning their name does not match their birth certificate, according to the Center for American Progress."
I still can’t get over how Chappell and Lady Gaga only talked about trans rights in their Grammy speeches without a single mention of women or the fact that our rights are being erased right now. Trump ordered women’s history removed from NASA and military websites, the CDC deleted critical women’s health data, the FDA erased diversity guidelines that ensured medical treatments were tested on women fairly, and the Department of Defense scrubbed content acknowledging women’s contributions. Yet they act like women are fine as if we’re not being erased in real time. So is it acceptable for women’s struggles to be erased and rights being stripped alongside racism being promoted while trans rights take center stage.
When men get them wrong you can tag it with #boymath btw
thinking of becoming an account that just posts basic arithmetic problems so people can get them wrong because they don't know proper order of operations
and this question is meant sincerely. what could this panther do to be more “feminine”? how many octaves does she have to raise her roar for you to hear her as a female? does it matter when she’s chasing you at full speed?
is she less violent with less melanated fur or skin? is she more violent the darker she is? does it change her existence as a female panther? does it change how she scales a tree in search of prey? does it change her love for her cubs, or the way she loved her mother when she was a cub? does it change the sharpness of her canines?
do you look at her and see her as a female? or do you see her as a panther first, with her femaleness being secondary?
why would a human female be stereotyped the instant she’s perceived? why does her skin correlate to violence or docility? why is she female before she is human? why is her existence inherently sexual, inherently meant for consumption?
it doesn’t have to be this way.
There's nothing more to being a human than having a human body either. That doesn't mean that someone who is a human is nothing other than their body or has no personality.
And really I wonder. Did they say "being a vagina" or "having a vagina"? Pretty big difference. Like "having 2 legs" or "being 2 legs".
If you can only view female people as vaginas or some creepy shit, that's not radical feminisms' fault.
Define woman
Why
Same honestly. The way he wrote about the women in the book was also extremely creepy. Like... really you want us to root for the main character who fantasizes about raping and murdering a girl for... being part of some celibacy club? This is a deep work of art?
Also, quite frankly for a dystopian book it was just too over the top and didn't really have a unique message. like "bad stuff is bad" type of message. F451 was a bit better, the themes about mindless entertainment as a distraction was good but in other ways, it was also similar. Maybe I just don't get dystopian books but Brave New World was actually good in my opinion.
please, tell me i’m not the only one who hates 1984 by george orwell with all the heart. everyone always describes it as this incredible book that will change your perception of the world, but honestly ... it didn’t. for me.
REAL
"we're all sinners" "love the sinner, hate the sin" "we deserve god's wrath"
i hated being told that i was inherently worthless in gods eyes. it really destroys your self esteem. it's basically saying 'before you're a human you're evil and deserve to burn in hell!'
so be it. anything to get away from you and your religion
Orange. Since we are recent mutuals, we should meet up at the picnic ^^
AWW YESS 🧡
I'm an 18 yo womanI'm a socialist and radical feminist and I will post about these topics a lotNo DNI but I will roast you if you deserve itkanrade #2 ☭✯☭
207 posts