A Lot Of People Do And Have Used That As A Scientific Proof. Again, How Else Can Be Considered Innate?

LITERALLY

These religions just exist to break you and build you up in the way that they want. They're just so... out there. Like, the most weird black and white thought.

And how the fuck is God gonna save you from HIMSELF??? Literal abuser rhetoric. Not to sound like an athiest neckbeard but it really does have all the traits of a cult.

I don't think people understand just how cruel the Abrahamic God IS according to believers.

According to each Holy Book, God created humans, giving them freewill and skepticism and no solid proof of him, so everyone has a different idea of him, and everyone who chooses the wrong belief gets tortured for eternity. And then this is considered… a blessing? This would be the majority of people. According to these books, he's torturing billions of souls for not sucking his dick. How insane. According to Christians and Muslims, their God would be more cruel to Jews and gay people than Hitler. Judaism is slightly better in that it doesn't even consider the Goyim as humans, so they aren't tortured and just go out of existence. I don't understand how believers in these religions can have somewhat normal morality and act normal around nonbelievers but then love a being like that. What about that feels you with love and light? Oh yeah, and what's even more insane is considering these religions peaceful and religions of love. I can't think of something more hateful than these religions. How much more hateful can you get exactly? Even Heaven is arguably bad too. In Christianity and Judaism, it's just constant worship of this genocidal grotesque God and you're a "sinless" shell of a human. That sounds like psychological torture to anyone who isn't absolutely batshit. In Islam, Heaven is basically nothing substantial for women, and for men, it's an eternity of cheating on your wife with 72 virgins who have no soul of their own. How can anyone hear these things and not have their skin absolutely crawl?

I would prefer Satan, I would say Satan is better for the sole virtue of rebelling against something so fucked up. Although I would say he's equal considered he only wanted to replace God out of his own ego. But, Satan is not the one who owns Hell, he's another soul being tortured there, God owns everything and chooses to cause suffering. How can an all forgiving Father cause his children to feel pain for eternity for something as small as disobeying him. Even the most abusive fathers in the world have not achieved that level of cruelty (although arguably the absolute worst ones would if they could, regardless, what a horrible metric). And apparently child rape is forgivable in the eyes of God and equal to the "sin" of masturbating, but simply refusing to believe? That's what gets you tortured forever? I'm not sure if a human being that reach that level of narcissism, but a supposedly self-sacrificing loving God according to Christianity can. The self-sacrifice wasn't even an actual sacrifice, he just supposedly got humans to kill an incarnation of him. What the hell is the point of that? According to the Bible, God also decided to get a 13 year old pregnant. He could have impregnated any virgin woman in the world begin God and all, but people want to believe it was a child. Jesus's teen mother is also one of the only significant female figures in Christianity and women supposedly came from a mans rib and then the rib-woman clone and the man created all humans through like 2000 generations of incest. Anything but admit that we're just a species of animal and we're more connected to rest of the Earth than they want to believe right? The misogyny of these religions creep into every page. Males couldn't accept that women in reality are the creators of life, so they had to make up this weird shit.

And sure, morality, is relative maybe. If we want to argue that. But these same people would be absolutely terrified of actually meeting a being like that. Horror books touch on it but rarely even meet that level of cruel. Maybe it's hard to conceptualize what torture for eternity means exactly or how insane it is for that to be a punishment for a belief, but I think you can fucking guess?

But it's the Buddhists, Hindus, pagans, witches, atheists, who are barbaric. Right.

thanks for being one of the only radfems i see who're ready to defend asexuals 💀

Bro no problem, that shit is so irritating. Thank you too for not being acephobic! I genuinely have no idea wtf is with most radfems and asexuals. What is their problem with some people just not wanting anybody lmao.

"get therapy it's just trauma"??? HUH

Wild take fr tho even if that was true. Like... so as a radfem, you want asexuals to go to therapy to want to fuck men after sexual trauma?(assuming thats who supposedly gave asexuals trauma) But also you should be 4B? Doesn't really even sound like a feminist or coherent take at all but ok 💀

"Let us have a special day for having non-natural sex or we'll call asexuals mentally ill for not feeling sexual attraction!!!!"

It's just a Madonna Whore complex on a mass scale

i hate how social media is pushing a tradwife/ sex worker dichotomy. Many of us have no interest in being either.

last thing we women need, is to have our rights set back several decades or more.

Well most people do have to work, that's just a fucking fact. So should children be allowed to skip/drop school and work or not? That would be treating a child like an adult.

"they cannot reasonably consent to"...hm... now why is that? Could it be lack of maturity? Children you know, not being the same maturity level of adults? Think!

All the fluffy idealism aside, you agree? giving children a choice in whether to go to school or, will just fuck kids up mentally? Certain skills are crucial to learn as a child, such as language and math, or else it becomes very difficult to pick up later. Children don't have the maturity to understand that and make a decision like that.

Nah not really, if anything you proved why "ageism" is necessary in these cases. If you agree with me on these, then you also recognize that children shouldn't be treated equal to adults.

thoughts on youthlib?

Honestly I had basically no idea about this movement but I just looked it up.

It makes some sense, like for rights to education, protecting children from child abuse, etc.

However, I don't see how it's a good idea to get rid of "ageism" towards young people since it's just a fact that children are immature and shouldn't be treated equal to adults.

How about you? (you can just send me another anon message saying "youthlib anon here" or something)

Honestly I've noticed that a lot of the anti-terf shit is like McCarthyism

Like the "if they talk about feminism a lot they're probably a TERF"

reminds me of the shit like "If they talk about workers rights they're probably a communist"

Like damn maybe kind of accurate but how is there no "are we the baddies" moment here?

Like seriously what is this shit bro? @oarfishing  https://www.tumblr.com/oarfishing/758650339125821440/alright-im-sick-of-seeing-terfisms-on-my-dash?source=share

wait... they went after hipster beers?

Source: {x}

Also this is a plan to make it so anyone with a name change won't be able to vote, aka most married women. But sure, misogyny is gone in the US I guess!

From the source: "The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act could prevent many married women from being able to register to vote.

The act, reintroduced by Texas Republican Representative Chip Roy, is intended to amend the National Voter Registration Act to ensure that all people registering to vote are U.S. citizens. It would require people to present in-person documentation as proof of citizenship when registering to vote.

Much of the documentation listed under the SAVE Act is based on having a birth certificate that matches the person registering to vote. However, as many as 69 million married women in the United States have changed their legal name since getting married, meaning their name does not match their birth certificate, according to the Center for American Progress."

I still can’t get over how Chappell and Lady Gaga only talked about trans rights in their Grammy speeches without a single mention of women or the fact that our rights are being erased right now. Trump ordered women’s history removed from NASA and military websites, the CDC deleted critical women’s health data, the FDA erased diversity guidelines that ensured medical treatments were tested on women fairly, and the Department of Defense scrubbed content acknowledging women’s contributions. Yet they act like women are fine as if we’re not being erased in real time. So is it acceptable for women’s struggles to be erased and rights being stripped alongside racism being promoted while trans rights take center stage.

REAL

christianity pet peeve

"we're all sinners" "love the sinner, hate the sin" "we deserve god's wrath"

i hated being told that i was inherently worthless in gods eyes. it really destroys your self esteem. it's basically saying 'before you're a human you're evil and deserve to burn in hell!'

so be it. anything to get away from you and your religion