Chat, Is Giving A Terrorist A State Funeral Supporting Terrorism?

Krishna ki Chetavani (Rashmirathi) by Agam Aggarwal. It's modernised music + vocals for a truly amazing poem by the poet Rashmirathi about an event from a literal epic.

If you have Spotify reblog this and tag what your number one song on your “on repeat” playlist is.

they always do.

despite knowing India's capacity for a second strike.

The Pakistani leadership seems a-okay with implying that they will sacrifice their own civilians to save their personal egos or whatever it is they are wanting to protect by refusing to de-escalate.

rlly? playing the nuclear card?

If Pakistan didn't want a war why were their literal Ministers threatening India with nuclear strikes on international media BEFORE the precise (very much non-nuclear) strikes by India?

I’ve been blocked by OP but here’s the post -

P.s Also op is so ignorant of the war mongering side of their nation. I’ve literally seen Pakistani media and Pakistani Islamists giving threats to nuke India.

I’ve seen Pakistani islamists discussing which Indian actresses they will take as captives (mal e ganimat) once the war breaks out.

Y’all aren’t even ready to see your own reality.

For fucks sake stop putting ignorant shit in these tags.

yeah, I realise it's just pointless.

I don't know why I was trying to convince someone whose stance is 'yay innocent Indians died for the cause of a terrorist groups' resistance' of anything.

It's the 'Why were you there huh? If you go there it's allowed for a terrorist group to kill you, you know' vibe. Just...yikes.

not even hiding it anymore, i see

"He can fix me" I say, as I point at lord shiva.

Trigger Warning - Photos of War

Scenes of unspeakable grief at the home of the Nargis Bano, Indian, 43, a fatal casualty in Pakistan shelling at LoC Uri sector.

you simply cannot separate the religious aspect from the kashmir terrorist attacks.

these people were not just random tourists they were murdered for being HINDUs after being violently humiliated and mocked for their faith in HINDUISM.

this was an act of terror perpetrated by those who despise hindus. period. and anyone who seeks to downplay this and say peace is for all and there’s no two sides to this are mere cowards who will never accept how rampant hinduphobia is and how soft targets hindus are because of our own inability to ever come together and take a stand. over and over again hindus have been targeted.

and once again any action that india takes will be twisted and analyzed wrongly by western idiots and secular believers who do not realize that the very country where hindus should be safe is failing them.

Pakistani military targeting civilians in Jammu and Kashmir 💔

why do the people with this stance justify the killing of innocent civilians in Pahalgam as 'well what did you expect when the govt occupied it'?

Setting aside the belligerent stupidity of the occupation nonsense, who made these people the incharge of deciding 25 Indians and 1 Nepali citizens were a-okay to kill because of a terrorist groups' crusade against the government if this is their stance on Pakistani civilians? Where was the outrage for the terorrists killing people instead of sending a strongly worded letter to the UN or whatever the hell you are expecting India to do in response to the killing of innocents?

My guy, either no civilians are fair game or all are. You don't get to decide Indian and Nepali lives matter less than your problematic faves lives. You're the one who started the grandstanding, at least stick to it.

terrorism isn't the fault of a state or its government though. just because terrorists allegedly from a given country carried out an attack doesn't really justify a military operation in that country. especially if everyone is opposed to those terrorists

Terrorism is not the fault of the helpless civilians of the state who are equally affected by it. However, terrorism is the fault of the government of the state, that continues to take no action and instead provide training to the terrorists, putting not only their country but countless innocent civilians - who despise terrorism as much - at risk. The attack - not only Pahalgam but countless cases of cross border terrorism which average atleast 2 incidents a year weren't "allegedly" from a specific country. Terror groups from within thay country have taken responsibility for most of the attacks including Pahalgam. Military operation has to be proceeded with if the terror harbouring country has been given numerous chances to combat and eliminate the terrorism on their own but have failed to do so over and over again and instead provide increased support. I understand that the Pakistani civilians don't like terrorism as much people think they do, because the rising levels of terrorism has an adverse effect on them as well but their own government and military has to understand this as well and work according to the needs of their people instead of inviting even more trouble.

It's morally reprehensible to expect the price of peace to always be Indian lives.

I don't care if you hate 'pajeets' or whatever the newest slur you guys have cooked up for Indians is. The current world order has decades of agreement on the fact that all innocent lives matter equally.

So no, you can't chill and feel good about giving us thoughts and prayers while my people die horrid deaths just so your feelings are protected.

We don't like that civilians on the adversary's side are dying either. But no reasonable country is going to sign off on its own citizens continuing to die at random because some malcontents amongst its neighbours just want to see them die. Don't hold us to moral standards you yourselves don't meet.

When Peace Becomes a Wound: India, Terrorism, and the Weight of Restraint

I’ve always believed in peace. I still do. I don’t dream of war. I don’t find glory in bloodshed. And I certainly don’t believe revenge heals grief. But what happens when the very peace you’re protecting is the reason you keep losing your people? What happens when the other side doesn’t believe in peace at all?

This blog isn’t written out of hatred. It’s written out of heartbreak, confusion, and the raw frustration of watching the same pattern play on loop - a terrorist attack, innocent lives lost, silence from the world, and once again, India is told to be “mature,” “calm,” and “restrained.”

How many Pulwamas? How many Pahalgams? How many coffins wrapped in our tricolour will it take before the world understands that peace without accountability is just a pause before the next tragedy?

India has tried. Again and again. Diplomatic talks, bilateral agreements, backchannel negotiations, and yet, terrorist camps continue to thrive across the border. How long are we expected to act like it’s not happening? And more importantly, why must we always be the ones trying?

Yes, I am anti-war. Yes, I believe in dialogue. But don’t confuse that with weakness. Because defending your people is not the opposite of peace ,it is the very foundation of it. What India did with Operation Sindoor wasn’t about revenge. It was about drawing a line , a line that should’ve been drawn long ago.

And let's address the said "diplomatic peace mediation" : the hypocrisy of international response. IMF loans flowing into a country that has harboured, sheltered, and at times even celebrated known terrorists. Social media giants gag Indian voices calling out terrorism, but conveniently stay silent when the hate flows the other way. Neutrality? Really? Or is it just comfortable indifference?

No, I don’t hate Pakistani civilians. I never will. But I will not pretend that both sides are equally innocent. I will not chant "peace" if it comes at the cost of more Indian blood. Because that’s not peace. That’s surrender.

India has done enough. Now, India is doing what it must. And if the world won’t understand that , maybe it never really cared.

I write this as someone who aches every time a soldier doesn’t return home. As someone who still wants peace , but not the kind that requires us to die for it.

Jai hind 🇮🇳