đ for Mordred if you will?
I have a headcanon that Mordred is a little magical, like Gawain and some of his other relatives. I donât think heâs been trained to use magic, at least not in any grand capacity, or heâd use it in plot-altering ways. Magic is just something that happens to him, like when he doesnât drown during the May Day massacre.Â
Where does the angst come in? I headcanon that his powers, which arenât really within his control, have a dark edgeâthe shadow to Gawainâs sun. Being around Mordred for too long can do weird things to people, and his presence makes them a bit queasy, even if they like him. Everything around him dies a little. Itâs always been that way, he knows it, and itâs part of what drives his arc down: if he acts like a monster, well, some part of him always thought he was one, anyway; and if heâs doomed, well, given what he does, itâs only fair.
The Melora + Orlando ship should be called Valor. I can think of a few reasons why:
Itâs a biblical reference, which seems in keeping with the storyâs themes, considering that Melora has the Lance of Longinus. âA woman of valor who can find? She is to be valued above rubiesâ is quite fitting, given Meloraâs association with a carbuncle (another red stone).
Both of their names contain âorâ.
Melorlando is a bit of a mouthful. Valor, on the other hand, is easy to say and sounds adventurous.
The problem with antisemitism and anti-Zionism
Someone recently reblogged this post I shared that called out antisemitism in pro-Palestinian rallies. An action I was initially happy about, until I went into this person's blog, and saw a lot of posts that I, as an Israeli-Jewish person, find incredibly antisemitic. I found myself utterly baffled by that. Because this person clearly recognized the things said in these rallies were extremely antisemitic, and yet, they posted a lot of things that were rooted in the same antisemitic worldview. Can't they see it? And I think the main problem with the current pro-Palestinian movement is that they honestly can't see the line between being on the side of compassion and humanity and being critical of Israel's actions, to spreading horrible lies and dehumanizing Israelis and Jewish people. And the ugly truth these people refuse to face is that the reason they can't see when they cross this line is probably unconscious antisemitism.
You don't need to hate Jewish people to be antisemitic
Antisemitism, like many other forms of racism, often works on an unconscious level. Maybe you have Jewish friends. Maybe you fought for better Jewish representation in media. Maybe you are even Jewish yourself. But over the years you have been exposed to a lot of antisemitic ideas and stereotypes that altered your worldview and made you more vulnerable to believing Jewish people are the bad guys.
If your gut reaction to this is- "but Israel is actually doing bad things, so I'm actually right about hating them." Please keep reading.
Your idea of Israel and what it stands for is based on the worldview of the most radical right-wing Israeli activists at best, and blatant lies at worst.
Imagine if we took the words of the most radical Republicans out there, the ones that go after trans kids and believe women should have no right over their own bodies, and believe all Americans are supporting this idea. That wouldn't have been very fair of us, right? Because there are a lot of people in America who are fighting for a better future. A lot of people who are standing up for human rights.
Just like the United States isn't a homogeneous entity, filled with only trump supporters, Israel is also an incredibly diverse place, with people who have radically different ideas about how Israel should look. Even the current Israeli government, which is extremely right-wing, and has people in it I personally believe should have never been in a position of power, is probably a lot less evil than you were led to believe by ill-intent strangers on the internet. Mainly because this is still a democratic government, in a democratic country, which has a lot of checks and balances that (for the most part) manage to prevent people with radical ideas from making them into official policies.
I don't blame you for believing the reports you see from Gaza. As a pacifist, and as someone who voted for left-wing parties ever since I was eligible to vote, someone who truly believes the Palestinians has a right to self-determination and sees how problematic the occupation is, I struggle a lot when I see posts about the suffering of the people in Gaza. Wars are horrible. I never want to see other people suffer. Let alone children. I wish I could go there right now and take all of them somewhere safe. I wish none of this was happening.
But I also know who my people are, and the values they stand for. And what I noticed about these anti-zionist posts is that they are often written in a biased, misleading way. They often attribute malicious intentions to Israel's actions. And they often jump to conclusions, without giving Israel the benefit of the doubt. Without asking the right questions. And often, without any sort of proof. Some of these posts are outrageous lies. Others are incredibly biased and fail to mention the terrorist organization Israel is fighting against.
Only a small amount of them are coming from unbiased sources that describe the reality of the situation without giving in to personal interpretation.
But most of you can't tell the difference. You are seeing lies about how IDF soldiers are targeting children, or about how Israel is lying about their true evil intentions, and you accept them as the truth, without questioning the intention of the person who wrote that post. Without stopping to think this is incredibly dehumanizing to think Israeli people are capable of such monstrous actions. Without examining your own biases. And that's incredibly problematic, and yes, this is antisemitic. Because you would have never spread this kind of accusation about any other group of people without definitive proof.
This isn't to say our soldiers are never wrong, and that there aren't any bad apples, or even systematic problems in the IDF and every allegation should be thoroughly investigated, because any harm to innocent people is terrible, unavoidable as it may be. And ideally, even terrorists should get a fair trial.
But if you think soldiers in Israel defense forces, who are mostly 18-21-year-old Jewish men and women from all sides of the political spectrum, are inherently evil and baby killers, you are in fact antisemitic.
Even if you believe your type of anti Zionism isn't antisemitism being anti-zionist is still not a great position to take.
I never defined myself as a zionist before. But it was more to do with my own disconnection with Judaism and my ideas about the place of religion in modern society than my belief about the right of Israel to exist.
I think it would be amazing to live in a utopian world where we have one multicultural democratic state where everyone lives together in harmony. But Iâm also a realistic person. And someone who wants to keep living as a free woman with full rights in my home country.
And while I never felt particularly zionist, I was never an anti-zionist, and I never believed zionist was a bad word.
I'm probably not the first person who tells you this, but Zionist isn't a synonym for "everything I hate about Israel". It doesn't mean "a person who supports the occupation", or even "a person who only cares about the life of Israelis" or "someone who fully supports the Israeli government".
So what does it actually say? Let's look at a dictionary definition.
Do you notice what the definition doesn't say? Anything about Israel's borders or about the idea of a Palestinian state. There are many types of Zionism, some more radical than others. But as I said before, is it really fair to judge an entire group of people based on the idea of the most radical of them?
The truth is, most of us just want to live in peace. We want to go to work without finding ourselves at the scene of a terror attack or running to the shelter because of rockets. We want all the hostages to come home. We want to feel safe in our own homes. This is what it means to be a zionist. This is what you are standing up against. Not the "occupation," or the "settlers" or the extremists in the government. Just regular people who want to live their lives.
Zionism isn't colonialism
Jewish people are indigenous to the land of Israel. This was the land we dreamed of in 2000 years of exile, and it's a huge part of our religion and our culture. This doesn't mean the Palestinians don't have a claim to the land as well after living on it for so many years, or that what they went through in 1948 wasn't terrible, but it doesn't magically make Israelis into white colonialists who woke up one day and decided to take over a random land.
A lot of mistakes were made. In 1948, and especially in 1967. And we are paying for them now. But the idea that Israel is a colonialist state that represents everything that's wrong with society is entirely false.
If you support the existence of a Palestinian state but don't believe Israel deserves the same right, you need to ask yourself why that is the case.
Is that because you don't believe Jewish people when they tell you about their connection to the land of Israel? Because you think there is something inherently wrong with the existence of a state that is only for Jewish people? (But have no problem with all the Muslim and Christian states out there) Because you think Palestinian deserves to live from the river to the sea and Israelis should have nothing, or whatever the Palestinians would be willing to give them? Because you are more comfortable with the idea of Jewish people as a minority in a Palestinian Muslim state than the idea of them having their own free country? Because you think you know better than us what our future should look like?
Because all of these reasons are antisemitic.
I'm sure he meant this as a compliment but it could just as easily be a grievous insult.
(from "The Dialogue of Myrddin and Taliesin" in The Black Book of Carmarthen)
ANTISEMITIC BIASÂ
Many antisemites donât consciously dislike Jews. They might even think highly of Jews. For example, they might believe âpositiveâ stereotypes of Jews, such as that Jews are good at business or good with money. They might have Jewish friends. They might like âsomeâ Jews. But they still cause tremendous damage to the Jewish community.Â
âBiasesâ can be defined as âan inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group.â
Unconscious biases are known as implicit biases. We all have implicit biases (whether negative or positive) in the way that we interpret the world around us. Conscious biases (such as, for example, the Nazis outwardly believing that Jews were âthe inferior raceâ) are known as explicit biases.
Because antisemitism is everywhere in our world â in our cultures, our languages, our folklore, our literature, our entertainment, our media, and more â itâs impossible for us not to internalize at least some antisemitic biases. These biases, however, exist on a spectrum: from unconsciously assuming that most Jews are wealthy (implicit bias) to believing the white supremacist conspiracy theory that Jews are enacting a âwhite genocideâ (explicit bias) to everything in between.
Because antisemitism is so old and so deeply embedded into our society and institutions (e.g. religion, language, literature, education, and more), that means that there is a lot of antisemitic bias in our world, most of which you might not even be able to see. But that doesnât mean it doesnât exist.Â
ANTISEMITISM IS A CONSPIRACY ABOUT THE JEWS
Antisemitism can be tricky to spot because it works very differently than every other form of bigotry. While other bigotries see their victims as âinferior,â antisemitism sees Jews as both âinferiorâ but also âsuperiorâ or all-powerful, capable of causing every calamity from wars to natural disasters to diseases to controlling the weather.Â
Societies project whatever they dislike most onto the Jews. In the Middle Ages, Jews were Christ-killers. In Nazi Germany and McCarthyist America, Jews were communists. In the Soviet Union, Jews were capitalists. In Nazi Germany and during the rise of the scientific racism period, Jews were the inferior race. To white supremacists, Jews are not white. To left-wing anti-Zionists, Jews are white. For centuries in Europe, Jews were untrustworthy foreigners from Palestine. But today among anti-Zionists, Jews are Europeans colonizing Palestine. We are whatever makes us the perfect scapegoat at any given time.Â
Itâs no coincidence, then, that antisemitism tends to surge most when societies are in upheaval. After all, the leaders need someone to blame. Examples of this include the Germansâ blaming Jews for Germanyâs suffering post-World War I, as well as the rise of the âDeadly Exchangeâ conspiracy which blames Israel for police brutality in the United States, following George Floydâs murder.Â
Antisemitism moves through conspiracy theories. Most notably, since to the antisemite, Jews are all-powerful, the most prevalent and deeply ingrained antisemitic conspiracies have to do with Jews and wealth and power. In the Middle Ages, for example, Europeans believed that Jews aimed to subvert Christendom. Since the 1920s, antisemitic leaders in the Arab world have rallied their followers behind the conspiracy that Jews intend to destroy Al-Aqsa Mosque and usurp Islamic lands. White supremacists â and far left anti-Zionists â today believe the âZionist Occupied Governmentâ conspiracy, which accuses Jews of controlling and manipulating the American government for their benefit.Â
Given the pervasiveness of conspiracies regarding Jews and power, antisemitism is nearly impossible to address without triggering more antisemitism. If an antisemite faces consequences for their actions, antisemites will use this as âproofâ that itâs the all-powerful Jews that have imposed these consequences. This makes antisemitism a self-fulfilling prophecy.Â
BIGOTRY WON'T ALWAYS BE OBVIOUS TO YOU
Most of us want to do the right thing. The problem is that bigotry â whether antisemitism or something else â doesnât come with a flashing neon sign that says âthis is bigoted! Call it out!â Instead, bigotry persists because entire societies convince themselves that their bigoted worldview is somehow justified. This is especially true of antisemitism. Antisemites throughout history have long persecuted Jews under the guise of seeking justice.Â
For instance, since the Middle Ages, Jews have been periodically persecuted on the accusation that they killed a Christian or Muslim child for ritual purposes. In other words, antisemites were seeking âjusticeâ for these children that the Jews allegedly killed. This antisemitic trope is called âblood libelâ and has led to the deaths of millions of Jews. Itâs safe to say that these murderous antisemites fully believed that they were doing the âright thing.â Some examples of historic blood libels that have resulted in violence against Jews include the William of Norwich blood libel (1144), the Damascus Affair (1840), and the Kielce Pogrom (1946).Â
During the Bubonic Plague, Jews were persecuted under the false accusation that they were âpoisoning the wellsâ and sickening the gentile population of Europe. Once again, the persecution of Jews was seen as just.
During the Nuremberg Trials, high-ranking Nazi officers testified that they believed that Jews were a danger to the safety of the German people and the German nation. In other words, they justified their mass extermination of Jew under the guise of âprotectingâ the people of Germany.Â
The list goes on and on. Is it possible that today you too have been made to believe that violence against Jews â Zionists, Israelis â is a just cause?Â
THE NAZI FALLACY
A few years ago, the notorious antisemite Shaun King argued with a Holocaust survivor on Twitter. When accused of antisemitism, he retorted, âI canât be an antisemite. I fight Nazis every day!â But anyone even remotely familiar with antisemitism or Jewish history will know that Nazis were far from the Jewsâ only historic oppressors. You donât have to be a Nazi to be an antisemite. In fact, most antisemites are not Nazis.Not even close.Â
Nazism is just one manifestation of antisemitism. Itâs a deadly one, certainly, but itâs also far from the only deadly manifestation of antisemitism. Jews have been killed by the thousands â sometimes by the millions â by a multitude of other oppressors. Some, like the Nazis, the KKK, and other white supremacists, are far-right. Others, like the Soviet Union, are far-left. Others are somewhere in the middle, and others oppressed us so long ago that their ideologies long predate the left-right political spectrum as we know it today.
The horrific images of Nazism and the death camps are seared in the worldâs collective memory. Itâs easy to think that if it doesnât look like Nazism, if it doesnât look like Auschwitz, then itâs not actually antisemitism, or perhaps it could be antisemitism, but itâs not serious antisemitism. In reality, though, antisemitism doesnât go from zero to Auschwitz. Instead, antisemitic tropes, conspiracies, and stereotypes fester and proliferate, operating under new euphemisms and adapting to whatever society theyâre in. Many of the same antisemitic conspiracies that drove the Nazis nearly 100 years ago are the exact same conspiracies that are driving âprotestorsâ to violently harass Jews in the streets of New York City today.Â
For many years before the gas chambers, antisemitism in Germany, which once was home to the most assimilated, well-integrated Jewish community in the Diaspora, proliferated in university lecture halls, justified and explained away in academic language. It wasnât deadly yet, but it soon would be. When you dismiss any sort of antisemitic rhetoric because it doesnât mirror the deadliest days of the Nazi regime, what you are actually doing is that you are contributing to the sort of hostile, conspiratorial environment that eventually made the Holocaust possible in the first place.Â
THE GASLIGHTING
Antisemitism and the gaslighting of Jews go hand in hand. If an antisemite faces consequences for their antisemitism, it simply reinforces their antisemitic beliefs. Because antisemitism always places Jews in the role of oppressor, itâs nearly impossible for Jews to seek accountability or justice without being accused of exaggerating, crying wolf, playing the victim, or otherwise having nefarious intentions.Â
After the Holocaust, for example, the second in command at the Red Cross, Carl Jacob Burckhardt, decried the Nuremberg Trials, calling them âJewish revenge.â Others, like the Palestinian newspaper Falastin, did so as well.Â
Antisemitic bias oftentimes makes it impossible for some people to see Jews as victims. If an antisemite loses their job for espousing antisemitism, they will then blame the âpowerfulâ Jews â or Zionists, or another euphemism â for taking their job. In that way, they turn the victim into the victimizer. This is a classic gaslighting tactic, which creates a catch-22 and is one of the reasons antisemitism can be so hard to combat.Â
For example, in the lead up to the Holocaust, American isolationists of various political persuasions accused Jews sounding the alarm on the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany of trying to instigate a war with the Germans.Â
Sometimes we are even accused of provoking or exaggerating antisemitism for our own benefit. There are a number of conspiracies, for example, that the Zionists worked with the Nazis to instigate the Holocaust to justify the creation of a Jewish state.Â
An example of the accusation that Jews play the victim is when we are told that we talk about the Holocaust âtoo muchâ â contrary to the statistics that demonstrate people are woefully misinformed about the Holocaust â or that we should move on because we âgot reparationsâ (not exactly true, but thatâs a different topic).Â
Then there are the accusations that we brought antisemitism or antisemitic violence onto ourselves â something that weâve seen on a grand scale following the Hamas massacre on October 7.Â
WHAT YOU CAN DO
(1) Listen to Jews. I donât mean just listen to your Jewish friends, or to the Jews you personally agree with. I mean listen to the Jewish community as a whole. Jews donât often agree on much, but at the end of the day, we are a community, and only the Jewish community can fully describe our own experience.Â
Donât listen just to the Jews who validate your views. Listen to the Jews that challenge you. Donât shut yourself off from learning because it might contradict whatever ideology you follow. Learning is a lifelong process. I promise you you donât know everything there is to know about antisemitism (I donât either! Iâm always learning). But itâs your responsibility to open yourself up to new information so that you can do better.Â
(2) if Jews are telling you something is antisemitic, then your first instinct should never be to distrust us.Can Jews weaponize accusations of antisemitism? Sure. Anyone can weaponize anything. Is it likely that thatâs whatâs happening? No. Antisemitism worldwide has skyrocketed to the highest levels since the end of the Holocaust. Itâs a very real threat taking lives. You should take accusations of antisemitism just as seriously as you take accusations of other bigotriesâŠeven if initially you donât see it.Â
(3) I canât stress this enough: do your best to educate yourself about antisemitic conspiracies, stereotypes, and tropes throughout history. The euphemisms may change â sometimes weâre âglobalists,â other times weâre âZionistsâ â but the formula remains the same. To be able to spot antisemitism, you have to learn to spot it. I recommend reading my post âThe Worldâs Oldest Hatredâ for more.Â
any platonic ships?
I like the wacky friendship between Galahad and the Grail Heroine. Theyâre both such weirdos (affectionate) that he thinks nothing of wearing a belt which she made of her own hair which she had previously been carrying around in a box because she had a prophecy. He needed a belt. She had hair. Thatâs just how they are.Â
When it comes to not-canon-anywhere friendships in not-canon-anywhere timelines, I think that it would be entertaining if Galahad was also friends with Mordred but either Galahad strenuously denied it to himself until he couldnât any longer or was somehow unaware of or unable to comprehend the absolute havoc wreaked by his friend.
Veronica Whallâs depiction of Galahad ascending, from King Arthurâs Great Halls at Tintagel
From Le Roman des Franceis (AKA Li Romanz des Franceis or Arflet) by André de Coutance, in which the poet is very concerned about the widespread(?) slanderous accusations that King Arthur was killed and replaced as king by a giant cat.
Going from left to right and down, the symbols stand for Galahad, Percival, Ragnell, Blanchefleur, the Grail Heroine, the Lady of the Lake who gives Arthur Excalibur, Guinier, Gawain, Dinadan, Ector de Maris, Morgan le Fay, Caradoc Briefbras, Griflet, Isolde, Vivian, Taliesin, Tristan, Brunnisend, the Nine Witches, Laudine, the Three Queens or Morgause, Kay, Dagonet, Merlin, Palamedes, Sebile, Guinevere, Igraine, Melora, Yvain, Mordred, and Arthur.
If youâre confused about some or all of them, hereâs my rationale/what the symbols are:Â
Galahad and Percival have slightly different Grails. I think Ragnell is found sitting under a tree, and another story has Gawain in a relationship with the queen of Avalon, isle of the apples. Blanchefleur means âwhite flowerâ. The square with the spiral in it is the Grail Heroineâs box of hair. The sword under the wave is fairly obvious. That is the drinking horn from Guinierâs chastity test. Gawainâs is a SGatGK reference. Dinadanâs is an aro ring. Ector de Maris, Griflet, Kay, and Palamedes all have symbols or patterns from their attributed arms. Morgan le Fay takes Arthur to Avalon on a boat. Caradoc has to be saved from a serpent which is wound around his arm. The torch is a Wagner reference. Nimue traps Merlin, whose symbol is the bird who shares his name, so she is represented by a birdcage. Taliesin got his wisdom from a cauldron, and thereâs a cauldron in the Preideu Annwfn. Tristan plays a harp. The formation of the relationship between Brunnisend and her eventual husband is defined by their dire yet mutually exclusive needs for a good nightâs sleep. The Nine Witchesâ symbol seemed cool and has a threefold element. Laudine has a magic fountain. The evolution of the nature and deeds of Anna/Morcades/Morgause/etc. seemed to sort of go with the Maiden, Matron, Crone archetype and I really couldnât think of anything else. Dagonet eventually became a jester. Yblis, who has a magic mantle, is Sybil scrambled, and there is a strong modern association between magic and capes. Guinevere is sometimes given authority over the knights of the vergescu. My justification for Igraineâs is particularly weak and would take too long to explain. Melora wields the Lance of Longinus. Yvain befriends a lion. Mordred has a broken table because he helped break the Round Table. Arthur is King.
why are all the Jews suddenly posting about cheesecake, you ask? because itâs Shavuot!
sorry, let me give you a quick guide to Jewish holidays
Rosh Hashanah: dip apples in honey, contemplate feeling guilty
Yom Kippur: feel guilty, donât eat
Sukkot: build a treehouse, shake a lemon at God
Simchat Torah: dance with a Torah scroll
Hanukkah: resist tyranny, eat fried food, set things on fire
Tu Bâshvat: hug trees, eat every type of fruit and nut you can acquire, do complicated wine math
Purim: put on a drunken play about a teenage beauty queen, cast shade at tyrants
Passover: donât eat pastry
Maimuna: eat a ton of pastry
Lag Bâomer: set things on fire, shoot arrows, learn about rabbis with laser eyes
Shavuot: eat cheese and stay up all night reading with your female friends
Tisha Bâav: mourn, preferably AT people
Hope that clears up any confusion
Dindrane: claimed I could remember my unborn sibling from Heaven, then gave a description of said sibling which turned out to be accurateÂ
Taliesin: went outside during a lightning storm and tried to fly away by using a Mary Poppins umbrella to catch the wind while making dramatic poetic declarations (I got about two feet in the air)
Sebile: tried to practice necromancy to talk to a dead Monarch butterfly
.
This isnât something I did, but an evangelical organization once showed up at my familyâs house to see whether one of us was the Messiah, and that seems pretty Galahad-esque.
Arthur: created clubs for the sole purpose of making myself in charge of them
Guinevere: played barbies, but the plot of the game was that they were fighting in world war iii
Lancelot: pretended to be an exterminator by spraying actual hornets with a hose, and somehow not getting stung, against all odds
Gawain: held stair-jumping competitions, and regularly jumped down around 10 stairs at a time
Merlin: designated a particular tree branch for reading and refused to let anyone climb this branch
Gaheris: held âscreaming contestsâ in my backyard to which invited my friends (this is exactly what it sounds like and it was banned by my mother immediately)
Dinadan: eaten spaghetti while riding a bike
Galahad: made a graveyard for bugs
Morgana: recruited a friendâs little brother to spy on said friend because she wasnât talking to me
Mordred: accidentally made a gallon of poison
In which I ramble about poetry, Arthuriana, aroace stuff, etc. In theory. In practice, it's almost all Arthuriana.
215 posts