Ethics and art - How considerate does an artist have to be?
Contemporary art seeks to challenge traditional boundaries, almost seeing how far it can go before it crosses the line. It can at times be confusing, confrontational and controversial and can shock or thrill the audience depending on the subject matter. Contemporary art can be anything from an installation to a painting, a performance to a sculptural piece, it can even be a random object that is claimed to be art. As there is no uniformity or formula, the artist can use any medium and can exhibit anything he/she wishes to.
Controversy in the art world has always existed. Even in Caravaggio’s religious works in the 15th century which depicted religious figures in a very realistic manner. One of his most controversial paintings at the time was ‘The Death Of The Virgin’ which depicted The Virgin Mary on her death bed. The controversy was not of the subject matter but more about the way that this biblical scene was painted. The Virgin Mary can be seen with her hand over her slightly bloated stomach and bared ankles which the audience found very upsetting. For these reasons it was rejected by the Chapel of Santa Maria della Scala for which it was commissioned by in Rome. It was also said that the woman that modelled The Virgin Mary for this painting was a common prostitute working in Rome. This brought further distaste to the artwork. Nowadays, it is a revered masterpiece however when painted, it was disputed over. A controversial modern day representation of The Virgin Mary is ‘The Holy Virgin Mary’ by Chris Ofili’. This painting depicts The Virgin Mary surrounded by the backsides of Women from adult magazines, balancing the canvas on two pieces of elephant dung. Ofili stated that it is a ‘hip-hop version (of the figure)’. The painting stands out with its vibrant use of colour, the yellow and purple starkly contrast with each other making the painting quite jarring and bright. Many would not find the artwork offensive at all however at the same this portrayal offended many religious people. It is difficult to please every individual audience member although I think that there is an unspoken responsibility to have mutual respect for the audience and be considerate of groups of the audience that may see your work.
When it comes to exhibiting artwork, ethics are important to consider. This form of ‘moral accountability’ encourages the respect of the audience. However, everyone will have a different opinion and take on the artwork and our life experiences will cause us to interpret art in various ways. At the end of the day, it is up to the artist to decide what to include in their work but some may argue that this doesn’t mean that the artist shouldn’t be held accountable for any content they exhibit. On the other hand, some artworks are intended to be controversial and aim to shock. The series of work 'Plum Grove' by Peter Howson (1994) does just that. This series of paintings, influenced by the break-up of Yugoslavia and the creation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, aims to portray these events in a graphic manner and the effect of the war on the civilians. Howson was the official War Artist for the British contingent of the UN Peace Keeping Force to Bosnia in 1993. As a result, his paintings included rape scenes, violence, and other graphic scenes which he witnessed himself or from eye-witness accounts. His paintings depict people in contorted positions with green and blue skin tones giving a sense of distress and pain. The paintings are quite expressive and have a sense of movement alongside a sense of exaggeration, exaggerating various features of the figures giving a further sense of suffering. The paintings undoubtedly leave the audience feeling uncomfortable. Although this series of work is in a way raising awareness of the events, some may say that censorship is necessary. Audience members who were not victims of the Yugoslavian conflicts or who have never experienced war of any kind can’t relate to the imagery as much as war survivors or people who have witnessed similar events. Although the subject matter is distressing and upsetting, the audience members are all effected in different ways based on their life experiences. The artist can choose whether or not to censor their work or to take ethics into consideration depending on the emotions they wish to stir up.
Appropriation, borrowing or recycling aspects of someone else’s work, plays a big role in contemporary artwork too. For example, in Banksy’s piece, ‘Show me the Monet’ (2005) a framed image of Monet’s painting is visible with orange shopping trolleys and traffic cones in his famous lily pond. I think that it shows the over-commercialisation of Monet’s work and art in general. Nowadays it is easy to see images of artwork online and it’s also common to buy merchandise with various pieces of art printed on. The imperative ‘Show me’ in the title of the piece further emphasises our consumerist society and ever growing demand for instant gratification. All of this has contributed to the devaluation of the artwork. Although the physical painting still costs a fortune, it is accessible on many platforms and is over-marketed so its purpose and meaning have been lost in the process.
I think that when it comes to handling delicate subject matters, it is important to somewhat take the audience into consideration. Some artwork is made for the audience to question and to be shocked by and will affect everyone in a different way but I think that there can be some occasions where a piece of controversial artwork can become disrespectful. Overall, I think that it is the role of the artist to push the boundaries of modern-day society and to adapt when necessary; a sense of mutual respect for all opinions and all views is important. Despite the fact that nowadays, art is created to challenge the audience and express emotion, I think that it’s the role of every artist to know what is appropriate and what isn’t depending on the subject matter they wish to portray.
References
https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/howson-plum-grove-t06961
https://artswithanna.com/2018/09/28/ethics-and-arts/
https://www.dazeddigital.com/art-photography/article/39894/1/that-time-this-chris-ofili-the-holy-virgin-mary-hip-hop-pissed-off-the-art-world
Kehinde Wiley and the male identity.
Kehinde Wiley , ‘Alexander The Great’ - Oil on canvas, 2005 ( 243.8 × 182.9 cm)
Kehinde Wiley is an African-American artist who conveys sensitive messages through his naturalistic, bright and vibrant work. In many of his paintings Wiley presents the male identity in a unique way. His painting ‘Alexander the Great’ showcases this, presenting a young African-American man in modern attire holding a sword and standing in front of a brocade-like pattern; typical of medieval tapestries and byzantine silk production in the 6th century.
Much of Wiley’s inspiration comes from classical paintings. The name of this painting ‘Alexander the Great’ references one of the greatest warriors in history. In his time, it was rumoured that Alexander the Great was Zeus himself. By the age of 25 Alexander was The king of Macedonia, leader of the Greeks, overlord of Asia Minor, pharaoh of Egypt and 'great king' of Persia. Although he was a great ancient leader, his brutality was also renowned and was known to be self-indulgent and reckless.
Wiley has also drawn inspiration from various paintings of Napoleon. His painting ‘Napoleon leading the army over the alps' is similar to that of Jacques-Louis David’s 19th century painting, ‘Napoleon Crossing the Alps’. Not just the names are similar, but the positions on horseback of both men in the paintings. However the man presented in Wiley’s painting wears an army uniform, giving his modern interpretation of the painting of Napoleon.
The painting, ‘Alexander the Great’ explores the male identity in a distinctive way that references the past and present. The painting is full of juxtapositions for example with the man’s headphones and the centuries old sword he is holding, the modern designer logo on his coat and the ancient textile pattern behind him. In paintings, a sword symbolises protection, strength and courage, which are all traditionally ‘typical’ male traits and something that Wiley strives to challenge. These ideals clash with the background colour which is green which represents peace, harmony and balance. These are more favoured male traits nowadays. Furthermore, it is possible to see that the background brocade pattern comes round and over the figure in the painting in some areas coming into the very foreground. The swirling and smooth pattern softens the painting and wraps around the strong and proud pose the man stands in. Brocade fabric and patterns are typically expensive and historically show upper class. The pattern makes Wiley’s painting appear more ornate and regal and also softens the proud pose of the man and shows delicacy and gentleness.
The pose in the painting is reminiscent of the painting ‘Napoleon Bonaparte in his Study at the Tuileries’, 1812, which presents Napoleon in a similar pose, with his hand on his hip, looking straight at the viewer in an imposing way, with a sword also featuring in the painting showing his masculinity and strength. Paintings of Napoleon are often grand and show his great power, but his violent tyranny and invasions are said to have been ‘grounded by an aggressive over-compensation for his short stature’ some historians say.
I think that this pressure of being as masculine as possible was something felt in the past as much as it is in today’s society which is something that Wiley intends to convey in his paintings. In my opinion, Wiley intends to show changing attitudes toward the male identity by referencing hyper masculine historical paintings. Wiley contrasts these attitudes with flowers, soft colours and intricate patterns, challenging the old ideals of male identity but also giving them a different and new relevance in the modern day.
References:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alexander-the-Great
https://www.artsy.net/artwork/kehinde-wiley-alexander-the-great
https://www.theartstory.org/artist/wiley-kehinde/
https://cxainc.com/edition/portraits-inspired-by-napoleon-by-kehinde-wiley-and-jacques-louis-david-come-together-for-the-first-time-ever/
Landscape art, Jeanne Claude and Christo.
Wrapped Trees, 1988
‘Wrapped trees’ by Jeanne Claude and Christo, is a unique piece of land art. The two artists worked together and were an art duo which focused on large scale artwork throughout their careers. Claude was from Morocco and Christo from Bulgaria, they were both born on the exact same day in the same year on the 13th of June 1935 and got married in 1960. Their artwork focused on wrapping up huge man made structures or huge natural structures. One of their most famous works was wrapping up the Reichstag in Berlin in 1995 which took 90 climbers and 180 installation workers to complete. This was done with polypropylene fabric and rope. Another piece that they are particularly well known for is wrapping up the West Coast of Australia in 1968. The fabric covered one million square feet, its size shows the sheer scale in the work of Claude and Christo.
The piece of land art ‘wrapped trees’ was created in 1988 and took 9 days to complete. 178 trees in a park in Riehen in Switzerland were covered by transparent fabric, and this artwork was left up for 3 weeks. The original plan was to wrap 330 trees in the Avenue des Champs-Élysées in Paris, however their plan was denied. The trees were wrapped with 592,015 square feet polyester fabric which is the same fabric used in Japan to protect trees from frost, snow and general winter weather. The fabric was all tied on just by using rope. The finished piece is very effective and the trees look ghost- like, mysterious and out of the ordinary. The fabric changed shape slightly and blew in the wind, at different times of the day, different colours light and different intensities of light would shine through the polyester fabric. This created a diaphanous effect which allowed all of the individual branches to be seen. The piece of land art was up in November, so the start of winter once all the leaves had fallen off of the trees. This allowed the branches and main structure of the tree to be seen clearly. The fabric also shrouded the trees in a way that gave the impression of the shape that all of the leaves would take if they were there. This use of negative space almost highlighted the absence of the leaves which gave a ghost-like quality to the work.
Christo once said “Jeanne-Claude and I borrow space and create a gentle disturbance in it for just a few days. When they appear for a few days, they carry this tremendous freedom of irresponsibility.” This quote reveals a lot about the intention behind the work of the artist duo. After all of their work, Claude and Christo made sure that the ropes and fabric that they used were never thrown away but recycled. It is possible that their work overall reflects the alteration of the natural world for our human needs; it could be a message about climate change and the environment. On the other hand, the work ‘wrapped trees’ could be about the fact that nothing lasts forever and everything is fleeting. The artists have to take their work down eventually, if they don’t then they would be intercepting with nature. In the quote, Christo talks about the ‘freedom of irresponsibly’. The artists had the freedom to put their work over the trees but then it is their responsibility to take it back down. This may reflect the importance for everything in nature to return to its natural state.
References
https://christojeanneclaude.net/mobile/projects?p=wrapped-reichstag
https://coveringchristo.wordpress.com/rationale/
http://www.artnet.com/artists/christo-and-jeanne-claude/
https://christojeanneclaude.net/mobile/projects?p=wrapped-trees
https://coveringchristo.wordpress.com/rationale/
Joiners for my photography workshop based off of the theme ‘distance forms around our bodies’, inspired by David Hockney’s joiners and the photography of Jingna Zhang. These were done through photoshop, I merged various photos together. I really enjoyed this workshop, I hadn’t done much on photoshop before so this was really new and interesting.
My sculpture workshop. We are studying character design and designing our own characters. Here are my characters in process. I have finished sculpting them in clay and in the next session I coated them both in latex to create a mold. My next step is to cover them both in modroc and fill them with plaster, which I am looking forward to.
Finished heart embroidery for my animation. A heart surrounded by embroidery folk patterns from around the world
Some lino cuts for the book i’m working on...
Resist dyeing. I decided to try resist dyeing again but this time with some different ingredients. These included, glutinous rice flour, rice bran, salt, water, glycerine and calcium hydroxide. First I mixed together the rice flour and bran and water together to make a dough and I then steamed the dough in dumpling sized balls for about an hour. While these were steaming, I put two table spoons of calcium hydroxide into one cup of water. I had to be careful with this as calcium hydroxide can be very dangerous if it come in contact with skin. I wore goggle, gloves and a mask. Once the balls had steamed I mixed them with glycerine, salt and the water from the calcium hydroxide. The chemical had settled at the bottom leaving me with just the infused water, I mixed it in. This created a smooth paste with which I printed my designs . This paste was a lot stickier than the last one I made so I was hopeful it was going to stay on during the dyeing process. Once it had all dried, I dyed the fabric. After leaving the printed fabric in the dye for an hour, I took it out to find that all of the resist paste had unfortunately dissolved. Even though it didn’t work, I learnt a lot from this process, it was interesting to experiment with all of the new ingredients.
Putting up exhibition space :)
My own photos for my Pathway project which were inspired by Charity Henderson’s work. She paints portraits in neutral tones and blurres them out slightly at the edges creating a smudged effect. Some parts of her portraits are in focus and some are completely blurred. I experimented with putting plastic bags in front of the face to made some white highlights and putting tracing paper on the face to smudge features