Some Illustrations Inspired By The Contemporary Illustrator Katarina Kerekesova And Also Inspired By

Prints from my own woodcuts.

This is a mask made from cardboard which I have just finished as part of my art foundation course. It’s a poppy seed head. I made it rattle inside using dried peas and rice.

How have contemporary values and media impacted upon the 16th century genre of Still Life?

Still life has changed dramatically throughout the ages but it is still popular today even if we might not realise it. Ranking the lowest in importance in the hierarchy of genres, established by the French Royal Academy, the still life was seen to require less skill than portrait paintings and historical paintings. However despite the perception that still life paintings were easier to paint, they explored dark and morbid themes usually to convey the message ‘memento mori’, ‘remember you will die’ and ‘vanitas’ ,originating from the word ‘vanity’, which would remind the viewer of their mortality and of the worthlessness of worldly pleasures . This was done by using skulls in compositions and candles that had just been blown out with the last wisp of smoke visible, symbolising death blatantly. On the other hand, some messages were more hidden in the paintings. Many pieces reflected death and  human nature in a very subtle way. This can be seen in Jan Davidsz. de Heem: Still-Life with Lobster and Nautilus Cup. The tipping cup could show the fragility and instability of humanity. The lobster is seen at the bottom of the composition and was regarded as something exquisite and expensive, only intended as banquet food. The lobster is inedible and ugly when alive and in the ocean but when dead, it possesses its delicious and beautiful qualities and is seen as something expensive and intended for the upper-classes. Maybe Jan Davidsz intended this to also reflect humanity and death.

The golden age of still life painting took place in the 17th century but throughout the 18th century and 19th century it became slightly less popular. In the Victorian era, still life compositions included every-day house-hold objects. However flower paintings gained a lot of popularity in the 1800’s, painters like Manet, in his painting ‘Bouquet of flowers’ (1882) and Van Gough in his ‘Still Life with Irises’ (1890) made their canvases bloom with their lively and vibrant colours with the intentions to make the paintings aesthetic and pleasant to the eye with harmonious colours. In the 19th century, the still life was adopted by Pablo Picasso and painted in his cubist style which was full of colour in contrast with the very first still life paintings which were full of shadows and chiaroscuro.

Nowadays, still lifes are created in a much different way influenced by new media. Instead of using the traditional oil paint and canvas, photography is used to capture aesthetic and ornamental scenes. These photographs are usually shared on social media instead of being sold or exhibited in a gallery. The purpose is solely to look pleasing to the eye or are created to show the life of the photographer of the arrangement. They often exhibit lavish food and drink that looks impressive or books and items related to the photographer. The still lifes are carefully arranged to look as perfect and possible. Although these photos with a pleasant colour palette do not have hidden messages of death and mortality, they reflect society and its quest for perfection in the modern age where you are what you post.

References :

https://www.britannica.com/art/still-life-painting#:~:text=The%20painting%20generally%20considered%20to,Lowlands%20during%20the%2017th%20century.

http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/b/british-watercolours-still-life-flower-painting/

https://www.romepix.com/blog/the-dutch-golden-age-in-art-pieter-claesz

https://fashionhedge.com/2017/06/19/net-bag-trend/

https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/v/vanitas

Painting workshop. Here are some photos of how I created the canvas and started painting. It has been amazing  and very useful learning how to create my own canvas and I am loving painting on it.

Finished heart embroidery for my animation. A heart surrounded by embroidery folk patterns from around the world

How does the use of concrete inform The Memorial For The Murdered Jews of Europe?

‘Denkmal für die Ermordeten Juden Europas’ ( The Memorial For The Murdered Jews Of Europe) Concrete memorial, 2004

The Memorial For The Murdered Jews Of Europe is situated in Berlin and stands as a poignant reminder of The Holocaust in 1941. This memorial was designed by the Burro Hapold group, a group of engineers from all around the world, the US architect Peter Eisenmann’s design was the design that it is based on. The memorial took 17 years to build, it was finished in 2004 and it consists of 2711 concrete steles over 19,000 square metres. The monumental memorial lies in the centre of Berlin near to the Brandenburg gate. It stands as a memorial to remind us of the horrific events of the Holocaust in the same city that the perpetrators had their offices in. 

Concrete is a reliable and durable material and is used in architecture as well as in sculpture and memorials. Throughout history, it has been used to communicate different ideas and messages and is easily accessible to anyone. This memorial is an example of how concrete can be used to convey a certain message. From a distance, it looks like a cold grey sea. The steles are dark grey and in a similar shape to coffins. Their height varies, some are just 20cm tall and some are 4.7m. The steles are meant to create an uneasy and confusing atmosphere which is further created by the ground underneath because it is wavy and creates a ripple effect. 

Although it is in the centre of the capital city, when you enter into the memorial, the din of the traffic fades away and it is almost silent in there. Due to its enormous size it is hard to run into many people, so it gives you a sense of isolation and you can feel the cold of the concrete around you. As you go further into the concrete memorial, the steals get higher, it feels intimidating and you feel very entrapped by this structure. When looking up, only the sky is visible. 

The memorial has many different interpretations. Some say that this sombre grey memorial represents the dehumanisation of the Jewish people during the Holocaust some also say that the different heights of steles represent the gradual escalation of the third Reich’s persecution. It is a possibility that the plain group of steles show the collective guilt of the German people. Another interpretation is that the strength and durability of the concrete reflects the strength of the Jewish people over the ages in the face of persecution. It is without a doubt that its function is to commemorate a tragic event and is set in concrete so that it may never be forgotten. 

~ I have used my own photos

Sources

https://www.visitberlin.de/en/memorial-murdered-jews-europe

https://www.museumsportal-berlin.de/en/museums/denkmal-fur-die-ermordeten-juden-europas-ort-der-information/

Sculpture and patination, Louise Bourgeois

Louise Bourgeois , ‘J'y suis, J'y reste’ (Here I stand, Here I stay) - Sculpture, 1990

Louise Bourgeois is known for her surrealist and abstract sculptures. Her assemblage piece ‘Here I stand, Here I stay’ (J'y suis, J'y reste) is of a pair of feet resting on a roughly cut block of marble with a glass house placed on top. In 1967–68 Bourgeois travelled to Pietrasanta in Italy, which is where she discovered the same marble quarries from which Michelangelo sourced his material. 

Bourgeoise’s work often explores the themes of feminism, family relationships and the unconscious. Born in 1911, she grew-up in Paris where her family owned a tapestry gallery and tapestry restoration business. When Louise Bourgeois Mother became ill with Spanish flu, the family hired a British au pair to teach Louise and her brother English. However the au pair soon became their Father’s mistress. This caused him to neglect Louise and her brother which was especially hard for Louise as she had to also care for her sick Mother often. Those childhood feelings of abandonment would become prevalent themes and ideas in the future artwork of Bourgeois. She married an American art historian and lived in America for the rest of her life, leaving her childhood in Paris behind.

The patination of the pink marble is irregular and coarse which makes it seem worn and ancient and this juxtaposes with the smooth texture of the feet which are also sculpted from the very same marble. The glass house which sits on top of the feet gives a certain fragility to the assemblage. The heavy marble again contrasts with the delicate house construction. It seems almost too fragile to be a safe shelter. This could possibly reflect Bourgeoise's own childhood which left her feeling exposed and alone in her family home. The fact that there's only one pair of feet could be referencing the abandonment she felt as a child and could reflect the unstable and lonely atmosphere. The house may also represent Bourgeoise's life as an artist. It gives a home to the bare feet which stand on a rugged piece of marble. This suggests that her art had given her a new way to express herself and fathom those feelings that she experienced as a child.

Sources:

https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/656887http://hdamarly.over-blog.com/2015/06/louise-bourgeois-enfance-et-creation.htmlhttp://www.theeastonfoundation.org/biography

Some lino cuts for the book i’m working on...

Recent lino cuts for my project re-connection. Looking at folk stories in modern day contexts. The top right lino cut was inspired by the Russian folk story, Vasilisa The Beautiful and the second lino cut (top left) was inspired by the Mexican folklore character La Catrina who is a symbol of The Day of The Dead.

Embroidery for my ‘Then and Now project’ which is my own design inspired by Slovak folk patterns. It is embroidered onto a blouse which will go with a skirt (that I am currently working on) :)