Carrying All The Groceries Up So My Wife Doesnt Have To

I love this so much

*being obsessed with fictional blonde psychopaths is a crime*

me:

just finished writing an incredibly horny creepypasta mpreg fanfiction. i feel really liberated.

"wait, can i say it?😄😁😅" i'm crying wtf. this is the man y'all be calling evil btw HAAAA

the cutest soul <3

i love how a big part of elizabeth bennet’s character is that she is obviously very smart, she is very observant, but she can easily be led astray by her preconceived notions, by things that she already has convinced herself of believing. and this is most obvious by her not seeing mr. darcy’s proposal coming at all, because girl that man was openly flirting with her. i don’t think this is shown a lot in the movie or the tv series, but he keeps teasing her, answering her witty remarks with a smile, the whole “i am not afraid of you” thing. like, charlotte saw it coming, colonel fitzwilliam definitely saw it coming, the gardiners knew as soon as they saw them together later in the book, mr darcy was not as subtle as he thought he was being

seriously, god bless you jane austen for giving us this romance of two fucking idiots constantly misunderstanding each other’s actions and intentions. god bless you for giving us mr “aha so like what do you think of your friend’s marriage? you wouldn’t mind living away from your family when you marry right? oh, no reason, no reason, just a random thought. and what do you think of rosings, you know if hypothetically you were ever a guest there, no, no reason hehe”, and miss “i wonder why i keep coming across mr darcy during my walks, i even made sure to tell him that this is where i usually take my walks so he can avoid me but we are still??? running into each other???? and he keeps asking me all these strange questions too, what a weirdo”

just, two idiots that were made for each other

YALL SEEN THIS SHIT :o

i’m going insane. #needthat

I think they certainly did make more aspects of the regency era more dramatic in bridgerton and I'm certainly no expert of this era but I think back in the regency era a man and a women 'sneaking away' (It'd probably look that way to most) to a dark corner in a garden or a room during a ball that they attended chaperoned would probably have been improper back in the actually regency era.

I think they difference is that Mr. Darcy actually called on Elizabeth and there was always the servants in/outside the room to kinda keep watch and they didn't just sneak away multiple times during a ball which was held at night to some room nobody else was in or going to enter. And they couple times they met in the gardens in the book wouldn't have been improper I don't think because it was during the day and they would have been in view of the house the whole time.

But again I'm not a pro at this so I could be completely wrong.

Perhaps this question has been posed before, but it’s been on my mind since the TV adaptation of bridgerton came out: one of the central conflicts of that show centers around the idea that gentry women can’t be around men unchaperoned. The show/source material are partially inspired by Jane Austen and regency aesthetics, but when i think about Pride and Prejudice there are many pivotal scenes where Elizabeth is alone with men and it’s not treated as scandalous. From my reading, the scandal usually stems from actual implications of seduction, ie; the way wickham absconds with much younger girls.

This isn’t to say the period didn’t have strict social rules, but the social rules in bridgerton have always seemed more Victorian/Edwardian to me than regency. I don’t know if those vibes are accurate or just my assumptions. When Elizabeth is alone with Darcy at the Collins’ or at the inn in Lambton, as far as I can remember there’s no real comment on the propriety of the situation. I don’t know if this is an actual reflection of what was appropriate during the time or if Austen is bending the rules for her narrative.

art trade connn!el hdp!! @pexess

I saw that and instantly heard Sloppy Seconds by Lay Bankz playing in my head. Holy shit that's 🥵🥵

emphasis on the sukanas backstory bc I'm mad curious

if I dont get it I will witewally go into boss mode of brainrot bc this isn't a want this is a NEED

JJK ENDING IN FIVE CHAPTERS WTFLOP I'M SO ILL??

i reckon we're gonna have a jjk part 2 bc there's NO way.

things we need:

sukuna backstory

gojo comeback!!

nobara comeback!!

funerals for nanami n nobara n ijichi and literally everyone who died

merger arc bye bye :(( OR NOT?? either way we need that whole "kenjaku's will" thing explained

WHERE IS YUTA IS HE OKAY

yuji's reaction to gojo/yuta

also megumi's reaction to everything he missed while he was depressed lmao

timeskip! to yuji and megumi doing laundry in the sun together happily ever after!

hakari v uraume IJBOL what r they doing ...

reblog and add more to the list bc there's NO WAY