Mhmmm

jrr tolkien does not get enough credit for his funny bitch move of inventing the word ‘gentlehobbit’

Jfk killed himself

sometimes i feel like im climing up this incline again alone but thankully sisypus and the itsy bitsy spider and here with me

Not that there's anything wrong with having something wrong with you

me when my driver loses the indy 500

house of leaves is the perfect book for people who love wikipedia but wish it could be scarier

BITCH I LITERALLY T O L D YOU HOW THE FUCK

HOW DID IT TAKE ME THIS LONG TO REALIZE AJ FROM ALY&AJ IS THE SAME AJ WHO PLAYS CATRA IN SPOP

Tablet Theory: The exhibits don't actually get their historical figure's personality and memories, they get what the person who created them believes those memories and personality to be (or the more needlessly complicated but poetic version: they take on what museum visitors believe about them). This would only affect exhibits who were created by someone else, so it wouldn't apply to Ahk and his family (or Rexy/the other animals, but we wouldn't be able to tell either way).

This is how Teddy, who irl apparently said some fucked up things about Native Americans, was able to fall in love with Sacagawea. It could mean that mummy!Kahmunrah is more chill than wax statue!Kahmunrah. It could also solve the potential paradox of museum exhibits knowing things about themselves/their time periods that historians don't know (just ignore the end of NATM 1. It's my bedtime) and then sharing that with random people during the night program.

The way I'm explaining it being canonically stated (in the books I think) that the exhibits take on the memories and personalities of their irl counterparts is that that's from the perspective of Larry/Nick, who don't know that it's not quite right.

we've done it again folks