Star Trek: Deep Space Nine - 7x04 Take Me Out To The Holo-Suite

kinda crazy that quark's main job is like. supplier of porn for deep space nine. like of course he also owns a bar. but what he really does in his heart and soul to make ds9 home. is sell people porn programs he's personally designed.

do you ever think about how Billie makes a pyre out of a boat for Daud after he dies in the high chaos ending of The Brigmore Witches.

do you ever think about how Billie makes a pyre out of her ship for Daud when he dies in Death of the Outsider.

do you ever think about how she was always destined to watch him burn. do you. do you

It Girl Jeeves

📺: Jeeves and Wooster

💿: IT GIRL - Aliyah's Interlude

dead

Running list of theories in Dunwall Tower as to who “the mystery twink” is, as created by The Watch:

Someone from Pandyssia (and it turns out Pandyssians are just Like That)

Sister of the Oracular Order with the gift of prophecy that’s disguised as a man and that’s why “he’s” Like That

Sister of the Oracular Order with the gift of prophecy that transitioned into a man and that’s why he’s Like That

Some guy who got in here somehow and no one knows how to get him to leave

A prostitute that’s somehow secured a government position (seriously what does this guy even do other than annoy people and look pretty)

The actual Royal Spymaster (“Lord Corvo is the Spymaster.” “That’s just what they want you to think.”)

A dog taken human form

A curse placed upon Lord Corvo specifically

A curse placed upon Sokolov specifically (most likely by Piero)

A ghost

An actual noble from Tyvia like Lord Corvo said he was (unlikely)

Another of Lord Corvo’s bastard kids (not to insinuate that Empress Emily The Wise, First of Her Name, is in any way a bastard)

Wyman (has anyone seen them in the same room together, honestly)

Collective hallucination caused by the remnants of the plague

The Empress’ boytoy (this is just Wyman again)

Lord Corvo’s boytoy (“It’s not a theory if they’re actually sleeping together.” “Which just means my theory is correct.”)

Brigmore witch???? Maybe????

Masked Felon???? Maybe????

The Outsider (“Are you fucking stupid?”)

GUYS GUYS GUYS GUYS GUYS LOOK

ITS THEM ITS THEM IN ONE PIC AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH

This is a once_in_a_lifetime chance for me to call this

Fifty Frames Of Gray✨

people online will try to tell me that I haven’t experienced “real abuse” because my dad never hit me but like. He didn’t allow me to drink water for hours on end while he cranked the heat up even in the summer. We weren’t struggling to afford it and he had plenty. He was allowed to drink water, but I had to sneak gulps from the bathroom sink. He also made me eat inordinate amounts of salty food. I don’t care if he never hit me, that is abuse. The first thing I would do when I got to my moms house was chug a glass of water, but I didn’t know how to tell her what had happened because it wasn’t “real abuse”

"But calling that abuse is offensive to victims of real abuse."

People always say this whenever something socially acceptable is labeled as abuse.

But that's not how abuse works. Not even close. Abuse, even "real abuse", always starts off being socially acceptable. Then, the abuser slowly experiments to see how much they can get away with.

Calling it "abuse" for a parent to expect obedience is not downplaying what victims of "real child abuse" experience. It's literally how "real child abuse" starts. First, the parent expects obedience. Then, once they can get away with that, they can justify punishments for disobedience. Then, once they can get away with that, they can gradually justify crueler punishments. Then, they eventually justify hitting, which society considers okay as long as it's only as a last resort. Then, it becomes more common, which they still get away with as long as the child doesn't end up in the hospital. Then, when the beatings become bad enough that the child does end up in the hospital, the parent can claim it was an "accident" and that they didn't mean for it to go that far. Then, when they face no consequences for their "accident", they can do it more often.

Calling it "pedophilia" for a middle aged adult to date an 18-year-old is not downplaying what victims of "real pedophilia" experience. It's literally how "real pedophilia" starts. First, they date an 18-year old, which society allows because "they're an adult". Then, they start specifically preferring 18-year-olds. Then, they start openly admitting that it's because they want someone less opinionated and more likely to obey. Then, once they know that they can get away with openly thinking of 18-year-olds as children while still having sex with them, it's quite easy to justify a relationship with a 17-year-old.

If you want to stop "real abuse", stopping the "lesser abuse" must be a priority.