Muni cat. We love mini cat
This is money cat. He only appears every 1,383,986,917,198,001 posts. If you repost this in 30 seconds he will bring u good wealth and fortune.
Years and years ago, I read a book on cryptography that I picked up because it looked interesting--and it was!
But there was a side anecdote in there that stayed with me for more general purposes.
The author was describing a cryptography class that they had taken back in college where the professor was demonstrating the process of "reversibility", which is a principle that most codes depend on. Specifically, it should be easy to encode, and very hard to decode without the key--it is hard to reverse the process.
So he had an example code that he used for his class to demonstrate this, a variation on the Book Code, where the encoded text would be a series of phone numbers.
The key to the code was that phone books are sorted alphabetically, so you could encode the text easily--picking phone numbers from the appropriate alphabetical sections to use ahead of time would be easy. But since phone books were sorted alphabetically, not numerically, it would be nearly impossible to reverse the code without exhaustively searching the phone book for each string of numbers and seeing what name it was tied to.
Nowadays, defeating this would be child's play, given computerized databases, but back in the 80s and 90s, this would have been a good code... at least, until one of the students raised their hand and asked, "Why not just call the phone numbers and ask who lives there?"
The professor apparently was dumbfounded.
He had never considered that question. As a result, his cipher, which seemed to be nearly unbreakable to him, had such an obvious flaw, because he was the sort of person who could never coldcall someone to ask that sort of thing!
In the crypto book, the author went on to use this story as an example of why security systems should not be tested by the designer (because of course the security system is ready for everything they thought of, by definition), but for me, as a writer, it stuck with me for a different reason.
It's worth talking out your story plot with other people just to see if there's a "Why not just call the phone numbers?" obvious plot hole that you've missed, because of your singular perspective as a person. Especially if you're writing the sort of plot where you have people trying to outsmart each other.
I love how the search function on this site is absolute garbage. I can look up a post word for word and I will NEVER find it
Reblog if its ok to spam you with boops
Posting every time it changes
I CAN DOUBLE TAP AGAIN!!!111!1!1!1!1!1!
Why did the tumblr app remove the ability to double tap a post to give it a like ☹️
2 notes for me
Yayy
SPAM BOOP ME!! IM BEGGING YOU!!
I WANNA MAX OUT THE RECEIVED
To Boop - either tap the boop button next to someone's name or go to their blog and tap the cat paw icon
To Super Boop - go to someone's blog and hold the cat paw icon until it spins once, then let go
To Evil Boop - go to someone's blog and hold the cat paw icon until it spins twice, then let go
Can't Boop - either you or the person you're trying to Boop hasn't opted in yet
To Opt In - go to your feed and you'll see the boop-o-meter and the option to opt in
I'll update this when I know how to get certain badges and such.
Hiya! I'm AG. My pronouns are he/him and I'm probably gay.
284 posts