Katara is canonically punk:A short meta/analysis
Explicitly a noncormist against toxic traditionalist roles(i.e her wanting to be a girl but not like is expected of her by the misogyny in society)
She works hard to disprove them too and encourages other girls to do the same
Runs her mouth 24/7 but especially to authority figures
Does direct action and literal eco-terrorism on a regular basis
Changed the system as a result(Became the chief of her tribe and helped decolonize the non-FN countries)
Super kind to younger people and has a strong sense of community
Intersectionalist who is respectful of all cultures except the Fire Nation and instead does reverse racism against them for being imperialists('Ash Maker' was reperations)
Had a crush on Jet because he's an experienced revolutionary and Aang had a crush on her for the same reason
This
^^^^Little Miss Punk Tactics herself
Some of you guys have never burned a CD and it shows
J Scott Campbell
Happy 14th Birthday to Portal 2
My scientist nerd goth queen 🤩
Best NCIS character
abby and her black umbrella make a beautiful combination
Oh wow that was fast! (Totally *not* because I don't know how to organize my reblogs yet...)
EDIT: I have realized there is no way to "organize reblogs". Instagram brainrot got me out here looking goofy
Just finished rewatching Maleficent and damn I forgot revenge is bad narratives can be good.
Like, ultimately the formula they follow is person A gets hurt by person B (often scarred for life/grievously injured) -> person B moves on and starts a family - A becomes bitter and angry and gets back at B -> but eventually decides not to go through with it because B has a family/it would make them just as bad, or they do and then feel empty/it’s unfulfilling.
And I hate it. I hate that the implication is that if you hurt the person who hurt you, you are just as bad as them. I much prefer the Inigo Montoya route: revenge is my purpose because someone did something bad to me -> I get revenge and this is great, I have achieved my goal.
And I could never pinpoint why that was the case until I was rewatching Maleficent with my sib and realized that it’s because most “revenge is bad” narratives center around the harm it will cause to person B. It centers around the harm it causes to the bully, the abuser, the perpetrator. It centers around B’s family, B’s friends. It never centers around A.
Maleficent, though, does center around A in a way I don’t see too often. Maleficent got hurt by Stephen. Stephen moves on, while Maleficent can’t. Maleficent becomes bitter and angry, and gets back at Stephen via cursing Aurora. Then Maleficent decides not to go through with it/regrets it.
But Maleficent makes the choice after. After Aurora wakes up, Stephen attacks Maleficent. He burns her, he chains her. Maleficent escapes, and then she doesn’t continue attacking Stephen. She throws him on the ground, moves to leave, he grabs her near her wings(the main source of her trauma and mirroring when he hurt her) and she pins him up against the wall. She can choose to kill him.
She doesn’t. And it’s a culmination of her healing, that she moves on. She leaves Stephen behind. And he can’t accept that, so in the end, he causes his own death.
It’s beautiful because it’s clear Maleficent is a victim, it centers around her trauma and her healing. Maleficent choosing not to kill him isn’t that it’s bad to get back at Stephen, that he doesn’t deserve death, it’s about the fact that she doesn’t want anything to do with him. He’s irrelevant.
And there’s the fact that he suffers, which is nice to see. But his obsession is another post. As is the parallels between this movie because I could rave all night about that.
New Crow Time - When you drink from silly fountain you get cartoon powers.
If you love Crow Time, consider supporting our comics on Patreon! You can support all our comics for $5, or just Crow Time for $2! What a steal!