i was like “oh no! he’s gonna eat these poor pups” but nah
What are you distracting yourself from?
“This is my simple religion. There is no need for temples; no need for complicated philosophy. Our own brain, our own heart is our temple; the philosophy is kindness.”
—
Dalai Lama
From your experience typing others or observing people type others, which types are the hardest to tell apart from the outside? I ask because I want to know when to be careful and look twice so that I can be more accurate. Thanks.
Common mistyping clusters (and the stereotypes involved):
ESFJ / ESFP / ENFP / ENFJ (romance/relationship oriented)
ISFJ / ISFP / ESFJ / ENFJ (generous, helpful, nice, “mom”)
ISFJ / ESFJ / ISTJ / ESTJ (bureaucratic, bland, conservative)
ISFP / INFP / INFJ (moral, misfit, reserved, emotional issues)
INFP / INFJ / ENFP (idealistic, introspective, writer/poet)
ISFP / INFP / ESFP / ENFP (artist, activist/rebel, “unique”)
ISTJ / ISTP / ISFP / INTP / INTJ (loner, do their own thing)
INTJ / INFJ / INTP (intellectual, socially awkward)
INTP / INTJ / ISTP / ISTJ (expert/scientist, competent, technical)
ENTP / ENTJ / INTJ / INFJ (ambitious, driven, resourceful, cold)
ESTJ / ESFJ / ISTJ / ENFJ (uptight, meddling, critical, “dad”)
ESFP / ENTP / ENFP / INFP (bumbling, no common sense)
ESTP / ESFP / ENFJ / ENTP / ENTJ (outgoing, charismatic)
You’d have to do a more detailed function analysis to get beyond the surface, refer to the Function Theory guide for more info.
How many philosophers does it take to change a light bulb? It depends on how you define ‘change’.
How many existentialists does it take to change a light bulb? Two – one to bemoan the darkness until the other redefines something else as light.
How many analytic philosophers does it take to change a light bulb? None – it’s a pseudo-problem…light bulbs give off light (hence the name). If the bulb was broken and wasn’t giving off light, it wouldn’t be a ‘light bulb’ now would it? (oh, where has rigour gone?!)
How many Heraclitians does it take to change a light bulb? None – it’s never the same light bulb again anyway
How many Epicureans does it take to change a light bulb? None – they’re too busy taking advantage of the darkness!
How many Marxists does it take to change a lightbulb? None. The lightbulb contains the seeds of its own revolution.
How many Nietzschians does it take to change a light bulb? 0.00001
How many fatalists does it take to change a light bulb? None, why fight it?
How many Humeans does it take to change a light bulb? None – since the bulb actually contains a gaseous substance, and thus contains no ‘abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number’ nor any ‘experimental reasoning concerning matters of fact and existence’ it will simply be removed and thrown in the fire…
How many Kantians does it take to change a light bulb? Two to change the phenomenal bulb; and one to explain that we might not have actually changed the bulb-an-sich at all.
How many theologians does it take to change a light bulb? 100 – one to change the bulb, and 99 to explain why an infinite God of love would allow darkness to occur in the world at all.
via: Philosophy Now
youtube.com/watch?v=tc-jMrxgPsw&t=47s
Ne is like time and space within itself, with so many possible timelines in existence.
Ni is like a weather forecasting stone, because it can just feel and tell what’s about to happen.
Se is like a camera, because it records everything around it and takes it in fully, every single detail.
Si is like a calculator, because it has all the info it needs to know stored within it, it remembers.
Fe is like a hospital, because it cares for those who are hurt, and fulfills their every need, and forgets about its own needs because it’s busy with others.
Fi is like a compass, because it leads us to the true and correct direction we should follow to stay true.
Te is like an office, because it’s organized and lets everyone know what needs to be done to get things done accomplished accordingly.
Ti is like a science lab, because once the experiments are conducted, it can analyze the results well.
“Ohhh, dadgummit!” Jack Schmitt tumbles over into the lunar dust during the Apollo 17 mission to the Moon, December 11-14, 1972.