the concept of distance is homophobic :(
hiya, don't know where else to throw this but. recently realized that being referred to in a plural way is,,, very nice,, (using we, being called darlings and puppies by those close to me (us?)) and this has been really interesting to feel and experience, especially since I had already been using we occasionally for a while before hand? talking to myself too but idk how unique that is to plurality..
this is a bit of a ramble but point is; very unsure, don't know if any of this means anything, and don't know how to find out if it does. need to do something to try and figure that out so; why not throw this here...?
oh we had 100% started sometimes using "we" or other plural language about ourself before we figured out we were plural lol
and you're 100% allowed to experiment with that stuff or ask friends to use it for you if it feels good. regardless of if that leads to a plural self-conception down the line.
being plural? awesome
being a singlet but using plural pronouns and shit? awesome
like. it probably means something. being referred to in ways that gesture at multiplicity feeling good probably means that reflects some way you are, or want to be treated or percieved. but it's yours to explore and decide the degree to which that does/doesn't change how many people all of you think you are.
death barter is a legit interesting worldbuilding idea lol
First thing you see after you zoom in is how you die
How you dying đź‘€
need to be squished between a couple on the couch as they slowly get more handsy and flirty with me until im a blushing flustered mess completely at their mercy
like if you’re reblogging shit like this you’re obviously a transmisogynist. this is such an obvious gamergate level strawman. even if the person holding this value actually exists (& i don’t doubt this is a misrepresentation) it would be pretty easy to ignore them instead of saying something on the level of, “look how far the trans community has fallen, trans women used to be ACTIVISTS and now all they are is annoying bitches”. It’s the exact same joke as when antifeminists argue that the feminists of old had REAL things to argue about — like employment! and voting! — but now they all just complain about people sitting funny on the bus. It’s a blatantly sexist & antifeminist strawman.
and to top this all off, it's tagged as "transandrophobia". like we're apparently supposed to laugh at the (probably fictional) trans girl being shit-talked in the original post, but simultaneously meant to consider "being told you can't have a blahaj because that's trans girl culture" as a serious example of bigotry against trans men? that's a pretty obvious double standard!
im like a kitten, i need attention and i need to curl up next to you and i need you to pet me and tell me im cute
reblog to bap prev with your paw
It's literally a moral obligation to tell that pre-transition trans girl that she's cute. Not in a patronizing way, but like… the kind of “you’re-gonna-break-hearts-one-day” cute. She deserves to know how radiant she already is, even if she hasn't bloomed fully yet. Like, hype her up. Every. Damn. Day.
And let’s be real—the pinnacle of sapphic trans joy? It's trans girls loving on each other with reckless abandon. Soft kisses exchanged between two women who’ve fought tooth and nail to become themselves? That’s the good stuff. That’s the kind of super gay energy that rewrites reality into something tender and hot and holy.
Tell me that’s not the most adorably gay, deliciously trans kind of love there is.
Point proven.