psst. hey
people who are legal adults who want their tubes tied or top surgery etc etc should be able to do so full stop.
"oh but what if they regret it for the rest of their lives"
okay. so what.
Adults make decisions about our lives, that's what being an adult is. We may decide to get a face tattoo, or quit a promising job, or join the army, or move to another country.
That's practically all we do as adults. We make decisions that effect the rest of our life, and then we live, or sometimes die, accordingly. Maybe i'll spend the rest of my life regretting telling my influential boss he doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground, but, as an adult, that's the kind of life decision i am allowed to make for myself. And after all, it might be the best thing i ever did. It's my life, and i get to do all the fucking around and all the finding out i want to.
surgical transition, or sterilization, or whatever... is exactly the same. If you aren't going to let a legally adult person decide for themself about that stuff, then you can't let them get a tattoo or move to Florida either
The most comprehensive link to donations, petitions, resources and information. Silence is compliance in violence.
Reminder that jkr basically funds a large portion of the terf movement in the UK and promoting harry potter and actively giving her money is helping fund that movement and is actively encouraging her and her followers because they see this as support
ChatGPT is running out of money because they haven't actually figured out how to make money with the plagiarism engine they created.
Like to charge, reblog to cast.
Tbh either option works for me đ¤ˇââď¸
hey vampires, demons and other terrors of the night it really isn't necessary to go to all the effort of kidnapping me to your castles and forcing me to be your bride i'll come willingly if you just ask
Weâre winning.
You know, it occurs to me that the known internet phenomenon of Reddit âam I the asshole?â posts having completely misleading headers is actually a really great example of a far less known but far more common practice of extreme journalistic spin in cases where there are large monetary incentives to diminish the story in question.
Like, if you see a Reddit post titled âAm I the asshole for buying my wife a new dress?â, the post is pretty much always something totally deranged like: âI (48) really dislike the way my wife (20) dresses, because I think itâs too revealing and makes her look slutty, which was fine when we started dating five years ago, but it makes me feel like sheâs going to cheat on me now that weâre married. Iâve politely asked her to get new clothes multiple times, and every time she refused because she said she liked her clothes, and didnât want to waste money buying new ones. Yesterday I couldnât take it anymore so I threw out a bunch of her old dresses and bought her a new one that was more modest looking. She started crying because one of the dresses I threw out had been left to her by her mom who died when she was a teen, but I couldnât have known that it had sentimental value. She said that I should have asked, but obviously if I asked sheâd have just told me not to throw out any of her clothes, including the ones that werenât sentimental. Also, the more modest dress I bought was pretty expensive, and she never thanked me for it. Am I the asshole here, or is she being unreasonable?â
Similarly, whenever you see a headline like âWoman Wins Millions From McDonaldâs Because Her Hot Coffee Was Too Hotâ, if you dig a bit, youâll almost always quickly find out that what actually happened was: A 79-year-old ordered coffee which, unbeknownst to her, was being served extremely dangerously hot, because McDonaldâs was trying to have coffee that stayed warm over a long commute without spending any extra money on cups with better insulation. The coffee spilled on the old womanâs lap, giving her severe third degree burns over a huge portion of her body, including her genitals. She got to a hospital and they managed to save her life with skin grafting, but she became disabled from the accident, and her genitals and thighs were permanently disfigured. She tried to settle with McDonaldâs for her medical costs, and McDonaldâs refused to cover any portion of her medical expenses at all, and so she sued. At trial, the jury discovered that this same exact thing had happened seven hundred times before, and McDonaldâs had still decided not to change their policy because paying out individual suits was cheaper than moderately reducing their coffee profits. As a result, the jury awarded punitive damages designed to penalize McDonaldâs two days worth of their coffee profits, in addition to the womanâs medical costs.
I think itâs largely the same phenomenon, but I know a lot of people who are familiar with the first case, but donât know to look for the second. If you see some totally outrageous âhow could a person ever sue over this stupid thing?â case, you should immediately be incredibly suspicious that thatâs all that actually happened, because a lot of the time, it absolutely isnât. The people who have the most incentive to make their opponent look not only wrong, but completely crazy for having any sort of grievance at all, are often the actually unreasonable ones.Â
Take a couple guesses đ
âĄhair pulling
âĄhaving financial stability
âĄchoking
âĄrecycling
âĄbondage
âĄsaving the bees
âĄrole playing
âĄhaving a healthy sleep schedule
You are still here. You are still breathing. All the things you have messed up: the words you ended up regretting, the mistakes you made at work or the tests you failed at shool; they simply do not matter. At the end of the day all that really counts is that you are still trying and that your heart is still beating.
JERUSALEM (AP) â The Israeli military campaign in Gaza, experts say, now sits among the deadliest and most destructive in history. In just over two months, the offensive has wreaked more destruction than the razing of Syriaâs Aleppo between 2012 and 2016, Ukraineâs Mariupol or, proportionally, the Allied bombing of Germany in World War II. It has killed more civilians than the U.S.-led coalition did in its three-year campaign against the Islamic State group. The Israeli military has said little about what kinds of bombs and artillery it is using in Gaza. But from blast fragments found on-site and analyses of strike footage, experts are confident that the vast majority of bombs dropped on the besieged enclave are U.S.-made. They say the weapons include 2,000-pound (900-kilogram) âbunker-bustersâ that have killed hundreds in densely populated areas.
and then people had the gall to say she was being unreasonable for setting boundaries
đłď¸âđ âđťâđźâđ˝âđžâđż18+ ONLY most things here are SFW but some could be NSFW and I donât plan on being banned for your stupidity.20 something, they/them
162 posts