US History
US History and APUSH Review Cram in 18 Minutes
Khan Academy || US History
APUSH Review exam
U.S. History Explained
APUSH Review Period 1-5
APUSH Review Period 6-9
“Let us simply say that once there was a place. A place where the universe had... cracked.”
“I wondered what that was like, to hold someone’s hand. I bet you could sometimes find all of the mysteries of the universe in someone’s hand.” — Benjamin Alire Sáenz, Aristotle and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe
Neil deGrasse Tyson is not impressed with all your sexism.
So important!!!
The government of Nunavut is looking at what it would take to have a guaranteed basic income in the territory.
A request for proposals for a feasibility study for a guaranteed basic income program has been issued by the Nunavut Department of Family Services.
A guaranteed basic income is a program that provides individuals and families with income sufficient to live on with few or no conditions for eligibility.
In 2017, 40 per cent of Nunavummiut relied on income assistance, according to the government of Nunavut. In 2019, 37 per cent of residents were on income assistance.
Continue Reading.
Tagging: @politicsofcanada
What were the main court cases we need to know? I know ones like Brown VBoard, RoeVWade, MarburyVMadison and that SupCourt Justice John Marshall from the late 18th to early 19th century was v impt. Anything else about judiciary stuff?
dred scott v. sandford (1857): establishes that slaves are property and have no rights (now viewed as a horrific mistake)
miranda v. arizona (1966): established rights of the accused (“you have the right to remain silent,” etc., also known as the miranda rights)
korematsu vs. u.s. (1944): ruled that japanese interment was legal (like the dred scott case, now viewed as terrible)
reynolds v. sims (1964): redistricted voting districts so that higher-population areas (read: areas more likely to have poor people/immigrants/poc) were equally represented in state legislatures, rather than being represented based on land area. the theory behind this is “one man, one vote”
gideon v. wainwright (1963): established that all accused have the right to a public defender
plessy v. ferguson (1896): ruled “separate but equal” things for black people were legal. overturned by brown v. board of ed
also, you definitely need to know that earl warren was the supreme court chief justice from 1953-1969 and that he was the force behind all those important ones during the 50s and 60s. very progressive dude. thurgood marshall was the first black justice, sandra day o'connor was the first woman. that’s all the major supreme court stuff i can think of!
I was scrolling through the notes after I posted something similar, and absolutely agree! Additionally whatever point is attempted to be made, if you overstate an issue you end up undercutting the actual problems at hand, as instead ppl want to focus on "larger problems" (whether these bigger problems are actually reflective of reality, it grabs attention more easily as it alarms the reader).
That’s 8% of transgender Americans. An additional 43% of transgender Americans are seriously considering moving due to laws criminalizing our existence and healthcare.
“So many people are completely helpless to get out, even with all the bumps and roadblocks, the fact is I'm still one of the lucky ones.” Said Sheena, a trans woman who fled from from Florida.
“it's evident that the United States is in the throes of a swelling crisis of internally displaced political refugees. Over a million people, themselves contemplating relocation in the coming months, remain in a state of apprehensive vigilance, awaiting the potential signal that they too must bid farewell to their homes.”
Via Erin Reed, a professional policy tracker of transgender legislation. June 13, 2023.