alright losers show of hands. who here thinks that "exploitation film" means the actors were literally unfairly exploited
happiest i was yesterday was sticking my head out the window driving thru the woods after the kentucky derby. happiest i was this week was seeing wiener dawgggg.
soooo miserable with my job lately. i want to give up all my worldly possessions. except for the ones i like. π§π»ββοΈ πΆ i miss my old man and his 2 ugly wiener dogs.
david cronenberg wasn't even the first guy to do the wound-vagina in the torso. that was larry cohen. are you listening to me tumblr.
eric bogosian photographed by andy warhol circa march 1984 (source: Andy Warhol Photography Archive// Contact Sheets: 1976 - 1987)
when the 70's exploitation film has better written female characters than anything directed by paul thomas anderson
my eccentric 55 year old coworker just told me that it's gay to talk to other men about movies because their sexual fantasies will always inspire their opinions on a film. he would do numbers etc. etc.
No hate to this person like I see what they're saying... any attempt to define a "life purpose" for any INDIVIDUAL person is just asking for evil. But y'all are completely fumbling the whole point. This is just hyper-individualist brainrot. No one thinks every individual person must be artistically inclined lest they be labeled a subhuman NPC. We're talking about SOCIETIES. MATERIAL CULTURES. GROUPS OF PEOPLE ALL COLLECTIVELY FINDING VALUE IN ART.
Got those nasty acrylic nails for my reservation at Dorsia tonight. Now I can give handjobs with teeth.