Little Ones

yearly pornhub search results have come out. a reminder that they no longer include just the term 'teen' because otherwise it dominates the entire thing. so, the number one this year is lesbian :X

wish i could be u’i 24/7

spiegel.de

Cristiano Ronaldo: Kathryn Mayorga, The Woman Who Accuses Ronaldo of Rape

An American woman claims Cristiano Ronaldo raped her in Las Vegas. Years ago, the soccer star paid her to remain silent. Now, the woman is g

i want this as its own separate post, because although many know that ronaldo has an 'accusation', i don't think many know the details and how much evidence of it there is, including a police report, medical records, a rape kit, an out of court settlement with an nda, etc. and as you reading this interview article by spiegel, one of the main exposers of ronaldo in this case, you just feel for this poor woman and absolutely believe her. the details are hard to bear, the interview is heartbreaking.

superman & batman: generations #1

[ID: Bruce Wayne clasping Clark Kent's hand in a gesture of comfort. Bruce is wearing a black suit and has his other hand on Clark's shoulder. Clark is wearing a light blue suit and his round glasses. They're both looking at each other somberly as Lois Lane stands in the background between them, looking at them both. END ID]

My mood during winter

Comet C/2020 F3 NEOWISE

credit

nah, pornography is inherently bad and harmful, I know you think your logic has no flaws but (and let's keep in mind that you are doing this rant for the solely purpose of justifying sexual books) it's the same logic paedophiles use when justifying fictional loli anime or similar stuff, and I mean the SAME "a book does not have real people" "a teenager is still using their imagination". I haven't spent my teenage years hating on anime watchers to not recognize their stupid logic when I see it.

I’m gonna keep going on the porn v real sex post btw cause I think it very neatly ties into what’s happening with book bans.

Parents of children know their kids are being exposed to sex at exceptionally young ages.

But parents of children also don’t or cannot admit that the way their kids are mainly being exposed is through items in the home: iPhones and iPads, streaming services, even quite explicit music on the radio or Spotify.

No parent wants to have to change something fundamental about their home has been running for years, like replacing smartphones with flip phones or putting time limits on non-homework computer use.

So they turn to the schools and the public libraries as places where teenagers are getting “porn” by banning books like A Court of Thorn and Roses.

But here’s the thing - a book does not have real people being really degraded. A teenager reading a “spicy” novel is still using their imagination even while consuming a book with sex in it. No one was harmed in the making of that book. And unless that teenager is literally finding fairies or whatever to have sex with (lmao), then reading that book at 15 is probably not going to have the same effect on the brain that we’ve been seeing happen to young brains and violent porn consumption.

And I wish it were appropriate to somehow bring this up at a book banning administration meeting without sounding like a crazy person.

Your daughter probably isn’t gonna be ruined by reading Philip Gregory romance novels from the public library. But there’s a very real chance your son might start choking out his first girlfriend during sex from watching violent porn on the smartphone you bought him.