4b Until Horny

Basing "feminism" and "praxis" on being a "girl's girl" or emphasizing "sorority" instead of critical analysis of female opression, which includes the criticism of certain women (madames in brothels, abusive mothers, female bullies, female sexual predators), was counterproductive.

It's a staple of this "feminism" to think of women's opression in feelings terms. It's bad because it makes you sad, or dysphoric, or desperate, or angry and therefore the solution is feelings based: you need to feel better, happier aka empowered. Which makes the fight for representation and diversity in media a crucial issue, for example.

Even issues in which legal protections should be emphazised, the usian utilitarianism twists them into feeling based "i dont feel safe around men in bathrooms".

The usamerican utilitarian basis (which priorizes happiness maximization) corrupts every ideology or political movement that steps a foot in the USA.

"Choice feminism" aka "liberal feminism" which is simply american misogyny spreads like fire thanks to its compatibility with fast and catchy slogans. Usian propaganda aka advertising and utilitarianism are totally compatible therefore usian misogyny is easily shared in social media, platforms made for marketing purposes.

Has anyone else noticed how many people are total flakes now? Is it more often or am I off base? Everyone I know talks about wanting to do something, but either won't commit or won't show up

Next time someone tells you women are meant to have children blah blah blah have them look up what a placenta is. We are so misinformed about the female body that despite most of us hearing that word before, we don’t really think about its role. The placenta is built by the embryo (not the mother) to essentially hide itself from the mother. Because otherwise she would KILL IT. It’s a foreign body with half of another person’s genetic code. Also we all have heard about the hormone HCG but most of us hear of it in regards to pregnancy tests and not the fact that it forces the mother’s uterus to start secreting a protein to feed the embryo. With every pregnancy, the fetus and mother are in competition. The fetus wants to grow and the mother tries to protect herself and not DIE. we are capable of pregnancy, we have the organs necessary to birth new life. This does NOT mean our organs are for anyone but ourselves. Every part of you is there FOR YOU. Regardless of what anyone might say. Don’t be ashamed of not wanting children. Don’t feel like a broken woman for not being able to have children. Don’t let anyone tell you your sexuality is wrong because it doesn’t result in offsprings.

I will never forget when I read a revolutionary, pioneering, piece of academic literature on feminist ethics by a truly inspirational feminist academic who is still active to this day, whose conclusion was that most women are too fucking stupid and dick-obssessed to even desire liberation from men, let alone to actually achieve it. I have never seen an academic veer from science and empirical evidence like that. The fact that she did it is a testament to how inferior and hopeless most women really are.

Here’s a question no one asks: WHY do we as humans need to keep reproducing? Why are we so special that we have to be on Earth at all times, even as other species go extinct?

What is so unique about us that we can’t go extinct under ANY circumstances? Is it that we’re capable of higher reasoning? In that case, do you think that those who are not capable of higher thinking are not worthy of existence? Is it something else?

What would happen if there were no humans on the planet? Why is it so bad to have less humans, or no humans at all? Because it hurts your personal feelings? Because you want your personal bloodline to continue? Why? Why is your bloodline so special that it should go on? What do you have that others don’t?



It is okay not to like sex. You are allowed to hate it as a concept and view it as disgusting. Whenever you hear/see/read etc about other people having sex and you feel disgusted, it is simply a natural reaction and one that should not be vilified.

Sex is not some god that you're required to worship. It is not a sacred cow and you are allowed to criticize it as an idea, as a concept. Some of the most common excuses sexuals use to defend sex (e.g sex is love or ) are easily debunked and are nothing more than rationalizations of personal weakness.

If of course, you don't feel that full on antisexualism is right for you, you could always step down and be sex-critical instead. After all, sex is not above criticism and anyone who makes fun of you for not wanting sex is clearly insecure about their own inability to find joy outside of a brief high that isn't worth the time and effort.

The most evil person you know is posting about being a people pleaser

being in a relationship with a man requires cognitive dissonance. When you’re a radfem in a relationship with a man, reblogging rape and dv statistics it’s so much more extreme than it is for the average woman.

For this to be true, heterosexuality as a whole would have to be challenged. That includes non heteros who seek to mimic such dynamics. We all know that won’t happen though. An actual feminist would protect children by demanding the porn watching father be removed from the house. Boy children wouldn’t be allowed preferential treatment. Mothers who bought their daughters razors and lipstick could be called out for grooming the next generation. Your desire to have babies with degenerate losers would no longer be enabled. We all know how that would go.

This is another call to extract resources from sovereign women. Who would only be further ostracized and ridiculed by the same women asking for help, if they actually delivered proper treatment. Women insist on cohabiting and procreating with the same half of the population they become paranoid about leaving their children with. Most women will eventually settle with a man and become pregnant. Meaning most men will be chosen by women. Yet, they’d never ask men as a collective to care for kids.

How does that work exactly? Most men have women willing to vouch for them and co-sign their social “safeness” by partnering up, but they’re still not fully trusted. If men are worthy of sleeping with and birthing, there should be no reason to fear their presence so much. These women would never call on men to protect every child they see, as most can barely be present for their own. Women reduce themselves to being incubators for predators, and want those who are free to be even lower than themselves. You’re the predator and groomers babysitter.

Question a mother on anything and watch her reaction. Try and instill actual feminist principles into children, especially daughters, and prepare to be torn a new one. More women will accuse you of malicious intent for letting their daughters know the truth about marriage and procreation, than they would for their beloved husband with “young” in his search history. If protecting children was considered important, majority of the population wouldn’t be here today.

Cat calling typically begins to happen for girls at age 10. 18 and under is when most abuse and assault takes place. Gendered grooming starts when the sonographer accurately reports a baby’s sex, with most women hoping for a son. Boy children are revered, and adult men are worshipped. If women continue to insist on bringing more children here, they shouldn’t require backup, as there’s no higher endorsement of our world than furthering it.

This is a losing game. Women know men are going to continue preying on children, even the ones they help make. Instead of swallowing their cognitive dissonance, they’ll blame unburdened women for continually failing. In the same way non lesbians employ homophobia the moment their lapdogs won’t defend, or excuse their dealings with men. CPS already exists, and is looked down upon. If child well fare were to be societally acted upon, no more than %2 of the population could parent.

You will do more to protect kids by never birthing them into our Earths low vibrational circumstances, and leading by example through freedom. A million man lovers could pitch into communal nurturing, making the world an even less safe place. While one highly functioning woman with the capacity to reason, discern her environment, and put logic over idealistic thoughts, would make more of a difference. Even if only once. You co create reality with your actions. Helping husband and wife only furthers their misery making. Keep children safe by refusing to succumb to societal guilt tripping by the child endangering masses,

I'm actually comfortable in this pit you put me in. I like it in here and I will resist any attempt made to rescue me. I'm happy with the scraps you feed me and I don't mind how sick I'm getting.