Lied abt not posting I love posting posting is my favorite thing ever anyway how does tumblr work
Brush theory is wild like the difference in art styles is insane
In case you were curious, this is how I looked getting a mcdonalds ice cream cone
I got bot spammed a few days again and I was going to block all of them but after only blocking one I gave up
And all I can think of it this
-a bunch of women walking into a club with all their friends-
-me the person who lets people in by lifting up the rope-
-everyone walking in and then I put the rope down on the last person-
Woman: hey man what the hell
Me: sorry lady I just hate you specifically.
it’s 1981 and you’re in the city getting chased by corrupt cops👮🏻♂️
some jasons and damians thats been piling up :]
(and tim and alfred the cat)
batboys for a secret santa!! they get a new brother for christmas :]
I forget to post my art here all the time
But like
Undertale, how could I not?? I'm just casually drawing the au 8 year old me came up with
Guys look it's Micheal
Sorry it's blurry-
There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue!
I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product.
Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?
Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.
Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases.
Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.
DO YOU REMEBER THAT POST ABOUT MADUSA WITH THE FUZZY SNAKES AS THE ONES ON HER HEAD?!
no?
Oh well I re drew it because I loved it so much