These Are The Real Monsters. We Don't Need Stories To Scare Kids Anymore, Give Them Nightmares. Because

चैत्र नवरात्रि

सर्वमङ्गलमाङ्गल्ये शिवे सर्वार्थसाधिके ।

शरण्ये त्र्यम्बके गौरि नारायणि नमोऽस्तु ते ॥

the love of my life, the queen of my heart, the very essence of my being, my salvation, my dearest, my beloved, may each breath comes out of me be an offering to your lotus feet.

Oh but don't you know, they're allowed to make such statements. You know because they've been oppressed and their voices have been suppressed for far too long :( :( :(

Btw this is happening in a “Hindu majority country”

anon legit went the caste system route and thought he did something

Connect everything to Caste - something never mentioned in scriptures to prove that Sanatan is bAd 🤷🏻‍♀️

I saw a post by one of my mutuals talking about dhoti. But I can't find it now. I just wanted to reblog it to say that I've heard many relatives and even my mother call a saree dhoti while talking in awadhi.

Which reminds me of this one very wholesome moment with my (now late) grandmother.

I was 5years old. And like every other summer vacation, we were visiting our grandparents in uttar pradesh. My parents had bought a really simple beautiful saree for my dadi. And the second day of us being there, my parents and I were sitting with my dadi and my parents told her that I had chosen and bought a saree for her (which was a lie but idk why my parents do that to involve me like all the time to show that I do think about all this). And my dadi got so happy saying "अरे हमार भैया हमरे खातिर धोती लाये अहेन? कहाँ बा?" So my mother sent me to go get it, because "i had picked it". But I replied to my mother "but hum toh dhoti laaye hi nahi hai. hum toh saree leke aaye hai dadi ke liye. dadi ko dhoti kyu chahiye? dadi dhoti pehente ha?". My mother replied didn't explain this to me. She just laughed and went with me to bring the saree and we gave it to daadi.

Literally has zero personality other than hating on Hinduism. It just shows that it's insecurity.

It is like something I read once. They think they'd be bullied or rejected for being a Hindu so they choose to do this. If that is the case with leftists/seculars, then they can't really call themselves that.

You guys do understand that it's a translation from either modern time or the 20th century.

Translation is the key word here

Girl I was going through Brahma Vaivarta Puran and the description of the ladies of golok made me grimace internally ....

I-

WHY .

I'm so confused cuz wtf is THAT 😭😭😭😭

Everything was fine untill that made them uneasy line came in...

What kinda men writting woman trend is this 😭😭😭😭😭

AND DON'T GET ME STARTED WITH WHAT'S WRITTEN BELOW THAT I'M IN TEARS WTF

😭😭😭😭

Remember, it was not an attack on Pakistan or Islam. It was an attack on terrorism.

Justice is served ,

Jai hind 🇮🇳

Subh Sita Navami 🪷

I bow down to the lotus feet of Bharateswari Mata Sita who is the mother of everyone, whose sole name is enough to bring peace to your wandering soul 🪷

You shouldn't expect a reward for something that is expected of you.

Just like when you're a parent, you are expected to support your kid, give them a good upbringing. You shouldn't expect rewards in return. The same goes for feminism. If you think your feminist views deserve a clap or a pat on the back, choose a better reason.

men lose their masculinity (the social reward for correctly performed manhood) through advocating for, sympathizing with, or doing labor that is allocated to women.

(and I'm not talking about some innate, spiritual, or psychological masculinity. I mean social masculinity--being regarded by higher ranking men as masculine.)

you genuinely do lose your current standing if you meaningfully and consistently object to the economic, legal, and interpersonal status of women, especially in ways that implicate men around you.

many men believe that if they are willing to do this, occasionally, then they are owed a recuperation of their masculinity through some other means.

if they are sacrificing masculinity through advocating for women politically, then they expect to bolster their masculinity through receiving expressions of gratitude and adoration by women ("feminist men are so hot" "consent is sexy" "pro-choice men get laid more" etc.) or they expect to bolster their masculinity through emasculating other men by asserting the standards of masculinity they adhere to are the "real" masculinity ("real men support women" "sexists are immature boys, I'm a man" "I'm secure in my masculinity and they're insecure" etc.)

to dismantle patriarchy, you need to be able to advocate for women even when it means losing gendered status. other men mostly will not respect you, and many misogynist women will not respect you either. it might not get you laid or praised or validated. in fact, it will probably subject you to increased scrutiny and criticism (because feminized subjects are always subject to such, and if you lose social masculinity, you too will experience this to some degree).

will you still advocate for women even if there is no social benefit and only social cost? do you have principles, or do you just want the fantasy of being a benevolent ruler?

Pakistani terrorist admitting that they are training terrorism in terror camps. Water is wet.