Content warning:
A potentially sensitive blog and I need to say it mentions abuse of autistic children.
The two critical factor about me which I suppose lead to this blog are two loves and a hatred:
I love the Murderbot Diaries and the character who I (don’t need to say this, but some people may have missed it) love the most (other than SecUnit, obviously) is Gurathin*.
I also love science, it’s my passion: especially the communication of science.
My hatred (and this will need clarifying, as I have limited reserves of hate and use it sparingly) is of the people who run, coordinate, organise and monetize the anti-vaccination movement. I don’t hate someone caught up in their often seemingly plausible and oh so seductive lies, I hate the Wakefields and the Kennedys and the Bigtrees.
And one reason I hate them is for the way they portray autism: they claim autistic children are “vaccine damaged” and they promote dangerous “cures” (horrific things like MMS, aka bleach).
As if autism were a thing to be feared, that autistic children are somehow broken.
I HATE THIS
This idea that you can cure autism, that autism could or should be defeated, that it’s a form of damage.
Hopefully that indicates where I’m coming from…
The Corporation Rim in The Murderbot Diaries is a capitalist hellscape.
In this horrific future world where we have the literal, explicit, slavery of constructs and the enslavement of bond workers I can imagine that those in power might encourage (even force) parents of autistic children to “treat them”, make them “normal”.
Hopefully you can see this would be very much NOT what I’d see as a good thing, but an extension of the terrible things we already see being done today.
And what if one “treatment” was a form of augmentation: something that is in the autistic person's brain “correcting” their behaviour to “act normal”, a device which might be said to “govern” their behaviour. Like ABA, but a device in your brain.
In the Murderbot Diaries we have Gurathin, an augmented individual who has made his way to Preservation. The nature of his augments are never made explicit (though he does apparently have a better connection with the feed, and visual augments- though we don’t know if the two are related). I think Gurathin is great, and the Murderbot Gurathin canon relationship is brilliant and extremely funny, Exit Strategy:
(“I don’t want to be a pet robot.”
“I don’t think anyone wants that.”
That was Gurathin. I don’t like him. “I don’t like you.”
“I know.”
He sounded like he thought it was funny. “That is not funny.”
“I’m going to mark your cognition level at fifty-five percent.”
“Fuck you.”
“Let’s make that sixty percent.”)
There is friction, a lot of it, in their relationship. An obvious root cause of this is their similarity**, as Murderbot says in Fugitive Telemetry to take just one little example:
“Gurathin seems to hate talking to strange humans almost as much as I do. ”
Perhaps his augments are why? Perhaps Gurathin’s augments’ purpose (or one purpose) was to moderate his behaviour, like the awful treatments promoted for autistic children in our world, the augments’ intent was to make him act like “normal”, or allistic people. Perhaps this is why he (remarkably) notices that their SecUnit is acting unusually, or not like a normal SecUnit? Perhaps Gurathin knows what it is to have something in your head controlling you, like SecUnit’s governor module.
Gurathin asks:
“You don’t blame humans for…what happened to you?”
I wonder what happened to Gurathin?
I’m so glad the both of them found Preservation.
So- it’s just a thought!
*I adore ART
** there is the ‘revealing that it’s rogue, calls itself Murderbot and the whole ‘killing 57 clients’ thing’ too, but they seem to have gotten past that!
Reblogging for *ahem* posterity.
they forcefemming luigi so straight men will be incentivized to learn about why the us healthcare system is broken
Lupins and Indian Paintbrush!!!
let's rest with mama
all coming back
“Sit down and shut up, men don’t have oppression to speak on, so men speaking on their problems is always and in every circumstance speaking over women/in opposition of feminism”
is just an extension of
“sit down and shut up, men are supposed to be stoic about their problems”
from toxic masculinity,
but this time dressed up dressed up in twisted-pro-feminism reasoning that doesn’t actually address the underlying problem with the attitude of societal repression of men’s emotions and discussions of things by which they’re negatively affected (be that by oppression or not).
I mean.
Oscar Santasusagna
that show is a comedy → 4/?
There is still value in understanding the darkness and the dirt.
Yes. Preach! If I can’t love my deeply fucked up fictional and RL historical characters, what is even the point of reading?
some ppl thought that adding black ppl to iwtv meant they were gonna "wokeify" anne rice and the bigots got mad at that mere promise while the leftists with poor media comprehension got mad at the failure to fulfill it but. anne rice works cannot be wokeified. she wrote about horrible lil gremlins with these nasty lil disrespectful unorthodox kinks lol. you will find sweeping romances in there and 0 of them healthy. the optics are bad, bad, bad! she would never get a publishing deal today because one of her characters would psychologically abuse the other one, and there wouldn't even be an after school special moment in the book where someone mentions the word "gaslight"!
the amc iwtv creators did not set out to distance themselves from the atrocities anne rice wrote, they set out to lean into them! to get closer, uglier, deeper in the dirt! how could you not recognize this from the very first episode when instead of making louis a white plantation owner they made him come from a black family who enslaved black ppl for capital gain and didn't feel real bad about it! perverse situation from the get go. you've recognized the ways in which the characters are evil and can be morally improved? congrats on step 1! step 2 is knowing these stories are not really interested in doing that. now you can finally begin to use your critical thinking as intended to ask: if these stories are not morality plays, what are they for? what do they say? well. great questions, now we're talking!
have your intersectional readings but kill the dichotomy, seek the nuance, bask in a narrative layered and baked in the complex stench of humanity! there is still value in understanding the darkness and the dirt. and sometimes when everyone's a murderer in your sandbox we can bury the word "problematic" and just have some fun ✌️🏽
99% of queer discourse stops right before they define the true difference between bisexual and pansexual!
Fandom consumer. Parent. Spouse. Xeriscape gardener. Rabbit hole enthusiast. 40-something. Neurodivergent (ADHD). Bisexual/pansexual. She/her.
64 posts