me: *puts effort into my appearance before i go out anywhere* *checks myself out in any reflective surface i encounter* *observes myself in the mirror from the perspective of a stranger*
the unavoidable presence of margaret atwood that resides permanently in my consciousness:
Human invention peaked when we created these bad boys
And that’s the motherfucking tea
“What I realized was that a lot of the engineers who work in AI felt that you could reduce the whole world to a function.
That life, human life, was just optimizing. And that the world could be simulated in a computer.
This is almost religious because I think that there are people who have the kind of thinking where they look at their life as a game.
Where they say: “Okay. I’m optimizing for money, and how many minutes do I have to do this.”
I tweeted out the other day: “Those people who think that we live in a computer simulation are the kinds of people who are most likely to be simulations.”
A lot of people approach life like an engineering problem. For them, I could imagine that they could see their whole life being in a computer.
But if you go into the humanities or the East Coast, there are a lot of people who don’t think like a computer.
They live life through experience and only things that happen actually matter. (…)
A lot of the papers that you see by the engineers say: “We’ll just define fairness as accuracy,” or something like that.
And this is what I call reductionist, because fairness is really complex, and it’s always contextual.
My concern is the stuff that we have, which is efficiency, productivity — that’s the stuff that makes us obese, creates climate change, income inequality.
The problems that we have today are caused by the tools that we created.
But I think there’s a lot of people who believe that more efficiency and productivity will fix everything.
I think right now there’s a lot of power in the hands of the reductionists.
And I would put economists and neoclassic economics in this, which is just reducing everything to just measuring GDP. (…)
If you go to places like MIT, the engineers have all the power, all the money, and everything looks like an engineering problem.
And we’ve made liberal arts sort of this sideshow.
I think that we need the historians, social scientists, anthropologists, qualitative people involved in asking the questions: why are we here, what are we doing?”
Source: Recode Decode — MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito on the problem with tech people who want to solve problems
Imagine getting lost in woods then you find a Bulbasaur trying to help you
I often wonder how many more scientists we’d have if we congratulated kids for working hard rather than praising them for being smart. We need to get rid of the myth that science is only accessible to an intellectual elite.
Don’t know how people deal with rough days when they can’t be surrounded by all their favourite things. It’s the only thing that’s getting me through.
Mr. Hozier, ladies and gentlemen
Small and angry.PhD student. Mathematics. Slow person. Side blog, follow with @talrg.
213 posts