You Guys Are So Annoying. Why Do I Have To See Discourse Every Year That's Like "was Tolkien Really A

you guys are so annoying. why do i have to see discourse every year that's like "was tolkien really a woke king or was he your conservative uncle?" the guy was a devout catholic and a genteel misogynist who maintained lifelong friendships with queer people and women, and this isn't even paradoxical because that was part of the upper-class oxford culture he was immersed in. tolkien told the nazis to fuck off (and in doing so demonstrated a real understanding of what racism is and why it's harmful, beyond simply "these guys are bad news because they're who my country is at war with right now") but his inner life was marked by internalized racism that is deeply and inextricably woven into the art that he made. he foolishly described himself as an anarcho-monarchist, and it's kind of crazy to see people on this website passionately arguing that he likely never meaningfully engaged with anarchist theory, because...yeah, no shit, of course he didn't. tolkien didn't have to engage with most sociopolitical theory because as an upper-class englishman of his position, he was never affected by any of the issues that this theory is concerned with. what is plainly obvious from reading both his fiction and letters is that tolkien's ideal political system was that the divinely ordained god-king would rise up and rule in perfect justice and humility; he didn't want a government, he wanted a king arthur, even though (obviously) he was aware that outcome was impossible. why is it so hard for people to accept that he was just some guy! his letters aren't a code you have to crack. no amount of arguing or tumblr-level analysis is going to one day reveal a rhetorically airtight internally consistent worldview spanning jrrt's fiction, academic work, and personal writings, thereby "solving" the question of whether he was a woke king or your conservative uncle. his ideology was extremely inconsistent because, at the end of the day, he was just some guy.

More Posts from Alcibiadesdildo and Others

alcibiadesdildo

2 months ago

how life feels after a salad and 64 oz of water

37K notes View Post

alcibiadesdildo

3 months ago

liking someone platonically is so embarrassing like. yeah i admire you. yeah i think about you all the time. yeah i look forward to every time i see you even if it's only for a minute. yeah it's all platonic and yeah i couldn't explain this because it'd sound romantic. fucking hell

79K notes View Post

alcibiadesdildo

3 months ago

bingo

45K notes View Post

alcibiadesdildo

1 month ago

Why I used to think handmade leather stuff was expensive: Cost of leather

Why I am now realizing it's expensive: Measure mark cut SHIT FUCKED THAT UP mark cut skive groove poke poke poke poke UGH WHY SO MANY SEAMS poke poke bevel dye dye WHY IS IT STILL STREAKY more dye topcoat burnish glue stitch stitch stitch stitch stitch RIP MY WRISTS hammer sand bevel edgepaint burnish burnish burnish

83 notes View Post

alcibiadesdildo

5 months ago

Way, way too real (source)

34K notes View Post

alcibiadesdildo

5 months ago

24K notes View Post

alcibiadesdildo

5 months ago

Okay I’m pretty anti Christianity in general because of my upbringing, but I fully believe the phrase, “then go and sin no more” is one of the most powerful statements of moral philosophy in the history of the world

Tags

rambles philosophy christianity ethics jeez jeez louise

0 notes View Post

alcibiadesdildo

5 months ago

begging people to remember that queer-platonic relationships are not one specific type of relationship, it’s any relationship between people who choose to queer expectations around what platonic means. queer-platonic relationships don’t need long-term commitment, queer-platonic relationships don’t need to be prioritized over other types of relationships, queer-platonic relationships don’t need to be “pure” (aka sexless, we know what yall mean by that /neg), queer-platonic relationships don’t need to be anything in particular, that’s the fucking point.

that’s why, i’m gonna be honest with you, i’m very confused at what queer-platonic attraction as a concept could possibly be cuz every queer-platonic relationship is going to be different, including in types of attractions involved (or lack thereof). the only way i could make sense of it is like as a type of attraction that makes you want to diverge from social normal around platonic attraction, but that is just not the definition it has at the moment.

that’s also why i’m confused with any posts that talks about queer-platonic relationships as if they’re like.. one thing. one universal experience for anyone who has them. they are not.

i could fuck nasty with a friend for two weeks, never do it again and it’d be a queer-platonic relationship. i could (hypothetically, i actually could never) spend the rest of my life raising a child with a friend, completely sexlessly and romancelessly, and it’d also be a queer-platonic relationship. hell, i could choose to schedule completely silent cuddling sessions with people i barely know once a month like it’s a business meeting and it could still be a queer-platonic relationships.

anyways, please read up on relationship anarchy if you haven’t already 🙏

913 notes View Post

alcibiadesdildo

5 months ago

God my friend is so fucking talented